Departmental Workload and Physician Errors in Radiation Oncology.
Journal
Journal of patient safety
ISSN: 1549-8425
Titre abrégé: J Patient Saf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101233393
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
30
6
2016
medline:
27
2
2021
entrez:
30
6
2016
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this work was to evaluate measures of increased departmental workload in relation to the occurrence of physician-related errors and incidents reaching the patient in radiation oncology. All data were collected for the year 2013. Errors were defined as forms received by our departmental process improvement team; of these forms, only those relating to physicians were included in the study. Incidents were defined as serious errors reaching the patient requiring appropriate action; these were reported through a separate system. Workload measures included patient volumes and physician schedules and were obtained through departmental records for daily and monthly data. Errors and incidents were analyzed for relation with measures of workload using logistic regression modeling. Ten incidents occurred in the year. The number of patients treated per day was a significant factor relating to incidents (P < 0.003). However, the fraction of department physicians off-duty and the ratio of patients to physicians were not found to be significant factors relating to incidents. Ninety-one physician-related errors were identified, and the ratio of patients to physicians (rolling average) was a significant factor relating to errors (P < 0.03). The number of patients and the fraction of physicians off-duty were not significant factors relating to errors.A rapid increase in patient treatment visits may be another factor leading to errors and incidents. All incidents and 58% of errors occurred in months where there was an increase in the average number of fields treated per day from the previous month; 6 of the 10 incidents occurred in August, which had the highest average increase at 26%. Increases in departmental workload, especially rapid changes, may lead to higher occurrence of errors and incidents in radiation oncology. When the department is busy, physician errors may be perpetuated owing to an overwhelmed departmental checks system, leading to incidents reaching the patient. Insights into workload and workflow will allow for the development of targeted approaches to preventing errors and incidents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 27355277
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000278
pii: 01209203-202009000-00016
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e131-e135Références
Hendee WR, Herman MG. Improving patient safety in radiation oncology. Pr Radiat Oncol. 2011;1:16–21.
Terezakis S, Ford E. Patient safety improvement efforts: how do we know we have made an impact?Pr Radiat Oncol. 2013;3:164–166.
Albert JM, Das P. Quality indicators in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:904–911.
D’Souza N, Holden L, Robson S, et al. Modern Palliative Radiation Treatment: Do Complexity and Workload Contribute to Medical Errors?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:e43–e48.
Huang G, Medlam G, Lee J, et al. Error in the delivery of radiation therapy: results of a quality assurance review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:1590–1595.
Olson AC, Wegner RE, Scicutella C, et al. Quality assurance analysis of a large multicenter practice: does increased complexity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy lead to increased error frequency?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:e77–e82.
Marks LB, Jackson M, Xie L, et al. The challenge of maximizing safety in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2011;1:2–14.
Mazur LM, Mosaly PR, Jackson M, et al. Quantitative assessment of workload and stressors in clinical radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:e571–e576.
Kalapurakal JA, Zafirovski A, Smith J, et al. A Comprehensive quality assurance program for personnel and procedures in radiation oncology: value of voluntary error reporting and checklists. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:241–248.
Chao ST, Meier T, Hugebeck B, et al. Workflow enhancement (we) improves safety in radiation oncology: putting the WE and Team together. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:765–772.
Arnold A, Delaney GP, Cassapi L, et al. The Use of categorized time-trend reporting of radiation oncology incidents: a proactive analytical approach to improving quality and safety over time. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:1548–1554.
Ong M-S, Magrabi F, Coiera E. Automated identification of extreme-risk events in clinical incident reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:e110–e118.
Chang DW, Cheetham L, te Marvelde L, et al. Risk factors for radiotherapy incidents and impact of an online electronic reporting system. Radiother Oncol. 2014;112:199–204.
Mosaly PR, Mazur LM, Jones EL, et al. Quantifying the impact of cross coverage on physician’s workload and performance in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3:e179–e186.
Reason JT. Human error; New York, Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
Rahn DA, Kim G-Y, Mundt AJ, et al. A real-time safety and quality reporting system: assessment of clinical data and staff participation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:1202–1207.
Mutic S, Brame RS, Oddiraju S, et al. Event (error and near-miss) reporting and learning system for process improvement in radiation oncology. Med Phys. 2010;37:5027.