Report of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table regulatory workshop update of the evaluation of new agents for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome: Executive summary.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ physiopathology
Angina, Unstable
/ therapy
Cardiology
/ organization & administration
Death
Education
/ methods
Endpoint Determination
/ methods
Europe
/ epidemiology
Female
Humans
Male
Myocardial Infarction
/ mortality
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
/ therapy
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reperfusion
/ methods
Risk Assessment
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
/ therapy
Thrombolytic Therapy
/ methods
Acute coronary syndrome
clinical trials
endpoint determination
myocardial infarction
unstable angina
Journal
European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care
ISSN: 2048-8734
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101591369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
1
7
2016
medline:
21
4
2020
entrez:
1
7
2016
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Regulatory authorities interpret the results of randomized controlled trials according to published principles. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is planning a revision of the 2000 and 2003 guidance documents on clinical investigation of new medicinal products for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to achieve consistency with current knowledge in the field. This manuscript summarizes the key output from a collaborative workshop, organized by the Cardiovascular Round Table and the European Affairs Committee of the European Society of Cardiology, involving clinicians, academic researchers, trialists, European and US regulators, and pharmaceutical industry researchers. Specific questions in four key areas were selected as priorities for changes in regulatory guidance: patient selection, endpoints, methodologic issues and issues related to the research for novel agents. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) should be studied separately for therapies aimed at the specific pathophysiology of either condition, particularly for treatment of the acute phase, but can be studied together for other treatments, especially long-term therapy. Unstable angina patients should be excluded from acute phase ACS trials. In general, cardiovascular death and reinfarction are recommended for primary efficacy endpoints; other endpoints may be considered if specifically relevant for the therapy under study. New agents or interventions should be tested against a background of evidence-based therapy with expanded follow-up for safety assessment. In conclusion, new guidance documents for randomized controlled trials in ACS should consider changes regarding patient and endpoint selection and definitions, and trial designs. Specific requirements for the evaluation of novel pharmacological therapies need further clarification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 27357206
pii: 2048872616649859
doi: 10.1177/2048872616649859
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM