IDENTIFICATION OF INCREASED BLUE LIGHT REFLECTIVITY IN MACULAR TELANGIECTASIA TYPE 2 USING SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY VERSUS RED-FREE FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHY.
Journal
Retinal cases & brief reports
ISSN: 1937-1578
Titre abrégé: Retin Cases Brief Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101298744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
15
2
2017
medline:
7
5
2019
entrez:
15
2
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare two modalities used for detection of the characteristic parafoveal hyperreflective area seen in macular telangiectasia Type 2. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope blue light reflectance was compared with red-free fundus photography imaging. Images were obtained as part of the international Natural History Study of Macular Telangiectasia (MacTel Study). The hyperreflective area can more frequently be seen with scanning laser ophthalmoscope blue light reflectance than with red-free imaging. Detection of the hyperreflective area might help to identify macular telangiectasia in earlier disease stages. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope blue light reflectance should be preferred as a diagnostic tool when the suspicion of macular telangiectasia arises. However, red-free imaging offers a viable option to scanning laser ophthalmoscope blue light reflectance when good quality is achieved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 28195982
doi: 10.1097/ICB.0000000000000550
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM