Evaluating feasibility and acceptability of a group WHO trans-diagnostic intervention for women with common mental disorders in rural Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Adult
Anxiety
/ diagnosis
Armed Conflicts
/ psychology
Community Mental Health Services
/ organization & administration
Delivery of Health Care
Depression
/ diagnosis
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Middle Aged
Pakistan
/ epidemiology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ ethnology
Psychotherapy, Group
Qualitative Research
Quality of Life
/ psychology
Rural Population
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
/ diagnosis
Stress, Psychological
Depression
group therapy
other psychosocial techniques/treatments
randomised controlled trials
women
Journal
Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences
ISSN: 2045-7960
Titre abrégé: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101561091
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
12
7
2017
medline:
13
9
2019
entrez:
11
7
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this feasibility trial was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the locally adapted Group Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention for women in the conflict affected settings in Swat, Pakistan. This mixed-methods study incorporated a quantitative component consisting of a two arm cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial, and qualitative evaluation of the acceptability of the Group PM+ to a range of stakeholder groups. For the quantitative component, on average from each of the 20 Lady Health Workers (LHWs) catchment area (20 clusters), six women were screened and recruited for the trial with score of >2 on the General Health Questionnaire and score of >16 on the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. These LHW clusters were randomised on a 1 : 1 allocation ratio using a computer-based software through a simple randomisation method to the Group PM+ intervention or Enhanced Usual Care. The Group PM+ intervention consisted of five weekly sessions of 2 h duration delivered by local non-specialist females under supervision. The primary outcome was individual psychological distress, measured by levels of anxiety and depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 7th week after baseline. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), general psychological profile, levels of functioning and generalised psychological distress. Intervention acceptability was explored through in-depth interviews. The results show that lay-helpers with no prior mental health experience can be trained to achieve the desired competency to successfully deliver the intervention in community settings under supervision. There was a good intervention uptake, with Group PM+ considered useful by participants, their families and lay-helpers. The outcome evaluation, which was not based on a large enough study to identify statistically significant results, indicated statistically significant improvements in depression, anxiety, general psychological profile and functioning. The PTSD symptoms and depressive disorder scores showed a trend in favour of the intervention. This trial showed robust acceptance in the local settings with delivery by non-specialists under supervision by local trained females. The trial paves the way for further adaptation and exploration of the outcomes through larger-scale implementation and definitive randomised controlled trials in the local settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 28689511
pii: S2045796017000336
doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000336
pmc: PMC6998939
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
77-87Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):23
pubmed: 19577683
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;4(2):104-12
pubmed: 26767354
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Oct 1;93(10):666-666A
pubmed: 26600604
Lancet. 2008 Apr 5;371(9619):1165-72
pubmed: 18395577
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Feb;83(2):81-5
pubmed: 2017915
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 17;4(12):e8343
pubmed: 20020047
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1654-63
pubmed: 22008420
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9
pubmed: 21035130
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Feb;46(2):163-73
pubmed: 18199423
Am J Public Health. 1996 Nov;86(11):1561-9
pubmed: 8916521
Lancet. 2008 Sep 13;372(9642):902-9
pubmed: 18790313
JAMA. 2009 Aug 5;302(5):537-49
pubmed: 19654388
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;61(3):210-5
pubmed: 21465929
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Aug 1;91(8):593-601I
pubmed: 23940407
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1581-91
pubmed: 22008428
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Mar;19(1):1-17
pubmed: 20104493
Psychol Med. 2003 Oct;33(7):1161-7
pubmed: 14580070
Confl Health. 2015 Dec 10;9:37
pubmed: 26664447
BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Oct 26;7:59
pubmed: 17963494
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992 Feb;180(2):111-6
pubmed: 1737972
J Affect Disord. 2014 Oct;168:452-8
pubmed: 25113958
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Nov 18;5(1):30
pubmed: 22099582
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Jan;38(1):35-43
pubmed: 12563557
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3117-24
pubmed: 12813117
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Apr;43(4):413-31
pubmed: 15701354
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):354-7
pubmed: 26407793
JAMA. 2013 Aug 7;310(5):477-8
pubmed: 23925613
Psychother Res. 2008 Mar;18(2):225-36
pubmed: 18815968
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941