Islam and the Urinary Stoma: A Contemporary Theological and Urological Dilemma.


Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 17 03 2017
revised: 09 06 2017
accepted: 27 06 2017
pubmed: 30 7 2017
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 30 7 2017
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The prayer ritual is an essential component of Islam that requires entry into a state of physical purity (wudhu) through ablution, which is invalidated by voiding. An important dilemma for patients and surgeons may arise when a Muslim patient is counselled on cystectomy because of the belief by some that an incontinent urinary diversion will automatically invalidate their wudhu. To determine if there are any religious barriers and implications for Muslim patients undergoing an incontinent urinary diversion. A questionnaire was distributed to all UK mosques, addressed to the imam (n=804). A total of 134 imams (response rate 16.7%) responded. There was general agreement among imams, with >90% answering that it is possible for a Muslim to perform ablution, pray, and enter a mosque with a urinary stoma. The majority of imams (86.6%) also stated that refusal of a urinary stoma was not justified by religious teachings. When asked if patients should choose the option of a neobladder despite this surgery having greater risk, 57.5% of respondents stated that they were either unsure or agreed with this alternative. The majority of imams agreed that Muslims with a urinary stoma are able to maintain their ablution, allowing them to conduct their daily prayers, and that this form of surgery should not be refused on religious grounds. Our study suggests that the consensus view is that a urinary stoma is not contraindicated with regard to the practice of Islamic prayer rituals. In this study we investigated if having a urinary stoma would be a religious barrier for Muslim patients in performing their obligatory prayer rituals. The overwhelming majority of imams stated that having a urinary stoma should not stop Muslim patients practising important aspects of their faith.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The prayer ritual is an essential component of Islam that requires entry into a state of physical purity (wudhu) through ablution, which is invalidated by voiding. An important dilemma for patients and surgeons may arise when a Muslim patient is counselled on cystectomy because of the belief by some that an incontinent urinary diversion will automatically invalidate their wudhu.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if there are any religious barriers and implications for Muslim patients undergoing an incontinent urinary diversion.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A questionnaire was distributed to all UK mosques, addressed to the imam (n=804).
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 134 imams (response rate 16.7%) responded. There was general agreement among imams, with >90% answering that it is possible for a Muslim to perform ablution, pray, and enter a mosque with a urinary stoma. The majority of imams (86.6%) also stated that refusal of a urinary stoma was not justified by religious teachings. When asked if patients should choose the option of a neobladder despite this surgery having greater risk, 57.5% of respondents stated that they were either unsure or agreed with this alternative.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of imams agreed that Muslims with a urinary stoma are able to maintain their ablution, allowing them to conduct their daily prayers, and that this form of surgery should not be refused on religious grounds. Our study suggests that the consensus view is that a urinary stoma is not contraindicated with regard to the practice of Islamic prayer rituals.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this study we investigated if having a urinary stoma would be a religious barrier for Muslim patients in performing their obligatory prayer rituals. The overwhelming majority of imams stated that having a urinary stoma should not stop Muslim patients practising important aspects of their faith.

Identifiants

pubmed: 28753875
pii: S2405-4569(17)30170-0
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.06.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

301-305

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Saiful Miah (S)

Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: saiful.miah@ucl.ac.uk.

Altaf Mangera (A)

Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Nadir I Osman (NI)

Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Suresh Venugopal (S)

Department of Urology, Chesterfield Royal Infirmary, Chesterfield, UK.

James Catto (J)

Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Derek Rosario (D)

Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH