Development of Survey Scales for Measuring Exposure and Behavioral Responses to Disruptive Intraoperative Behavior.
Journal
Journal of patient safety
ISSN: 1549-8425
Titre abrégé: J Patient Saf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101233393
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2021
01 10 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
14
9
2017
medline:
19
2
2022
entrez:
14
9
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Disruptive intraoperative behavior has detrimental effects to clinicians, institutions, and patients. How clinicians respond to this behavior can either exacerbate or attenuate its effects. Previous investigations of disruptive behavior have used survey scales with significant limitations. The study objective was to develop appropriate scales to measure exposure and responses to disruptive behavior. We obtained ethics approval. The scales were developed in a sequence of steps. They were pretested using expert reviews, computational linguistic analysis, and cognitive interviews. The scales were then piloted on Canadian operating room clinicians. Factor analysis was applied to half of the data set for question reduction and grouping. Item response analysis and theoretical reviews ensured that important questions were not eliminated. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach α. Model fit was examined on the second half of the data set using confirmatory factor analysis. Content validity of the final scales was re-evaluated. Consistency between observed relationships and theoretical predictions was assessed. Temporal stability was evaluated on a subsample of 38 respondents. A total of 1433 and 746 clinicians completed the exposure and response scales, respectively. Content validity indices were excellent (exposure = 0.96, responses = 1.0). Internal consistency was good (exposure = 0.93, responses = 0.87). Correlations between the exposure scale and secondary measures were consistent with expectations based on theory. Temporal stability was acceptable (exposure = 0.77, responses = 0.73). We have developed scales measuring exposure and responses to disruptive behavior. They generate valid and reliable scores when surveying operating room clinicians, and they overcome the limitations of previous tools. These survey scales are freely available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 28902006
pii: 01209203-202110000-00012
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000423
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e607-e614Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors disclose no conflict of interest.
Références
Lucian Leape Institute. Through the Eyes of the Workforce: Creating Joy, Meaning, and Safer Health Care . Boston, MA: National Patient Safety Foundation; 2013.
Villafranca A, Hamlin C, Enns S, et al. Disruptive behaviour in the perioperative setting: a contemporary review. Can J Anesth . 2017;64:128–140.
Wahr JA, Prager RL, Abernathy JH, et al. Patient safety in the cardiac operating room: human factors and teamwork: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation . 2013;128:1139–1169.
Rosenstein AH, O’Daniel M. Impact and implications of disruptive behavior in the perioperative arena. J Am Coll Surg . 2006;203:96–105.
Vukmir RB. Disruptive Healthcare Provider Behavior: An Evidence-Based Guide . New York, NY: Springer; 2016.
Vessey JA, Demarco RF, Gaffney DA, et al. Bullying of staff registered nurses in the workplace: a preliminary study for developing personal and organizational strategies for the transformation of hostile to healthy workplace environments. J Prof Nurs . 2009;25:299–306.
Haines T, Stringer B, Duku E. Workplace safety climate and incivility among British Columbia and Ontario operating room nurses: a preliminary investigation. Can J Community Ment Heal . 2007;26:141–152.
Michael R, Jenkins HJ. Work-related trauma: the experiences of perioperative nurses. Collegian . 2001;8:19–25.
Smith J. Bullying in the Nursing Workplace: A Study of Perioperative Nurses. Phoenix, AZ: University of Phoenix; 2011.
Coe R, Gould D. Disagreement and aggression in the operating theatre. J Adv Nurs . 2008;61:609–618.
Cook JK, Green M, Topp RV. Exploring the impact of physician verbal abuse on perioperative nurses. AORN J . 2001;74:317–320, 322–327, 329–331.
Chiou ST, Chiang JH, Huang N, et al. Health issues among nurses in Taiwanese hospitals: national survey. Int J Nurs Stud . 2013;50:1377–1384.
Dunn H. Horizontal violence among nurses in the operating room. AORN J . 2003;78:977–988.
Dull DL, Fox L. Perception of intimidation in a perioperative setting. Am J Med Qual . 2010;25:87–94.
Manderino MA, Berkey N. Verbal abuse of staff nurses by physicians. J Prof Nurs . 1997;13:48–55.
Pisklakov S, Davidson ML, Schoenberg C, et al. Feeling bullied at the workplace. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand . 2014;58:373–374.
Walrath JM, Dang D, Nyberg D. An organizational assessment of disruptive clinician behavior: findings and implications. J Nurs Care Qual . 2013;28:110–121.
1992 salary/career survey: gains are moderate. OR Manager . 1992:1, 6–11.
Hutchinson M, Wilkes L, Vickers M, et al. The development and validation of a bullying inventory for the nursing workplace. Nurse Res . 2008;15:19–29.
Saxton R, Hines T, Enriquez M. The negative impact of nurse-physician disruptive behavior on patient safety: a review of the literature. J Patient Saf . 2009;5:180–183.
Goettler CE, Butler TS, Shackleford P, et al. Physician behavior: not ready for “Never”land. Am Surg . 2011;77:1600–1605.
Zbar RI, Taylor LD, Canady JW. The disruptive physician: righteous Maverick or dangerous Pariah? Plast Reconstr Surg . 2009;123:409–415.
Reynolds NT. Disruptive physician behavior: use and misuse of the label. J Med Regul . 2011;99:8–19.
Manthous CA, Ivy M. Commentary: disruptive physicians. Am J Med Qual . 2012;27:258–260.
Dang D, Nyberg D, Walrath JM, et al. Development and validation of the Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey. Am J Med Qual . 2015;30:470–476.
Groarke LA, Tindale CW. Good Reasoning. Matters! 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004:93–97.
Saindon J. Clarifying meaning through definition. In: Argument and Argumentation. Toronto, Ontario: Nelson Education; 2008:28–33.
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health . 2006;29:489–497.
McNamara D, Graesser A, McCarthy P, et al. Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix . 1st ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol . 1995;50:741–749.
Suen HK, Rzasa SE. Psychometric foundations of behavioral assessment. In: Hersen M, ed. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment (Volume 3- Behavioral Assessment) . John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey; 2004:37–56.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (US). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999.
Villafranca A, Hamlin C, Jacobsohn E. Intraoperative Behaviors Research Group. Physical and psychological abuse in Canadian operating rooms. Can J Anesth . 2017;64:236–237.
United Nations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948–1998 . New York: United Nations Dept. of Public Information; 1948.
Seel NM. Achievement deficits of students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. In: Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning . New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
Leung T, Kim MS. Eight conflict handling styles: validation of model and instrument. J Asian Pacific Commun (John Benjamins Publ Co) . 2007;17:173–198.
Schaubhut NA. 2007. Technical Brief for the Thomas Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Available at: https://www.cpp.com/Pdfs/TKI_Technical_Brief.pdf . Accessed October 21, 2016.
Volkema RJ, Bergmann TJ. Interpersonal conflict at work: an analysis of behavioral responses. Hum Relations . 1989;42:757–770.
Constantine MG, Ponterotto JG. Evaluating and selecting psychological measures for research purposes. In: Leong FTL, Austin JT, eds. The Psychology Research Handbook: A Guide for Graduate Students and Research Assistants . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006:104–113.
Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess . 1995;7:309–319.
Ntoumanis N, Myers ND. Introduction to factor analysis and structural equation modeling. In: An Introduction to Intermediate and Advanced Statistical Analyses for Sport and Exercise Scientists . West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2016:79–100.
Geiser C. Linear structural equation models. In: Data Analysis With MPlus . New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2013:24–80.
Ma C, Shek D. Subjective outcome evaluation based on the perception of program implementers. In: Shek D, Sun RCF, eds. Development and Evaluation of Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programs (P.A.T.H.S.) . New York, NY: Springer; 2013:121–135.
Little TD. Model fit, sample size, and power. In: Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling . New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2013:106–136.
Savalei V, Bentler P. Structure equation modeling. In: Grover R, Vriens M, eds. The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2006:330–365.
Olobatuyi ME. Kinds of research models on path analysis. In: A User’s Guide to Path Analysis . New York, NY: University Press of America; 2006:114–131.
Dilalla L. Structural equation modeling: Uses and issues. In: Tinsley HEA, Brown SD, eds. Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling . New York, NY: Academic Press; 2000;439–464.
Martinez W, Pichert JW, Hickson GB, et al. Programs for promoting professionalism: questions to guide next steps. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf . 2014;40:159–160.
Shapiro J, Whittemore A, Tsen LC. Instituting a culture of professionalism: the establishment of a center for professionalism and peer support. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf . 2014;40:168–177.
Webb LE, Dmochowski RR, Moore IN, et al. Using coworker observations to promote accountability for disrespectful and unsafe behaviors by physicians and advanced practice professionals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf . 2016;42:149–161.
Nielsen MB, Notelaers G, Einarsen S. Measuring exposure to workplace bullying . 2010:149–175.
Sullivan TJ. Constructing question, indexes, and scales. In: Methods of Social Research . Orlando, FL: Harcourt; 2001:148–182.
Pisklakov S, Schoenberg C, Marcus A, et al. Available at: http://www.asaabstracts.com/strands/asaabstracts/abstract.htm?year=2013&index=15&absnum=3220 . Accessed September 6, 2017.
Pisklakov S, Davidson ML, Marcus AF, et al. Available at: http://www.asaabstracts.com/strands/asaabstracts/abstract.htm?year=2012&index=15&absnum=2612 . Accessed September 6, 2017.