Rates of Duodenal Biopsy During Upper Endoscopy Differ Widely Between Providers: Implications for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease.


Journal

Journal of clinical gastroenterology
ISSN: 1539-2031
Titre abrégé: J Clin Gastroenterol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7910017

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 3 11 2017
medline: 24 4 2020
entrez: 3 11 2017
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The goal of this study is to determine factors associated with performance of duodenal biopsy during upper endoscopy. Celiac disease (CD) prevalence approaches 1% in the United States and Europe, yet CD remains underdiagnosed, in part because of low rates of duodenal biopsy during upper endoscopy. We aimed to identify patient and provider factors associated with performance of duodenal biopsy during upper endoscopy. In our hospital-based endoscopy suite, we identified all patients not previously diagnosed with CD who underwent upper endoscopy during a 5-year period for one of the following indications: abdominal pain/dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), anemia/iron deficiency, diarrhea, and weight loss. We employed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine the association between clinical factors and the performance of duodenal biopsy. Of 8572 patients included in the study, 4863 (57%) underwent duodenal biopsy. Of those who underwent duodenal biopsy, 24 (0.49%) were found to have CD. On multivariate analysis, age, gender, indication, gross endoscopic appearance, physician affiliation with a celiac disease center, and absence of a participating trainee were all significantly associated with the performance of duodenal biopsy. There was wide variability among providers, with duodenal biopsy rates ranging from 27% to 91% during these procedures. A duodenal biopsy is more likely to be performed in younger patients, females, and for key indications such as weight loss, diarrhea, and anemia. Providers varied widely in the performance of duodenal biopsy. Further study is warranted to better understand the decision to perform duodenal biopsy and to determine the optimal scenarios for its performance.

Sections du résumé

GOAL
The goal of this study is to determine factors associated with performance of duodenal biopsy during upper endoscopy.
BACKGROUND
Celiac disease (CD) prevalence approaches 1% in the United States and Europe, yet CD remains underdiagnosed, in part because of low rates of duodenal biopsy during upper endoscopy. We aimed to identify patient and provider factors associated with performance of duodenal biopsy during upper endoscopy.
STUDY
In our hospital-based endoscopy suite, we identified all patients not previously diagnosed with CD who underwent upper endoscopy during a 5-year period for one of the following indications: abdominal pain/dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), anemia/iron deficiency, diarrhea, and weight loss. We employed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine the association between clinical factors and the performance of duodenal biopsy.
RESULTS
Of 8572 patients included in the study, 4863 (57%) underwent duodenal biopsy. Of those who underwent duodenal biopsy, 24 (0.49%) were found to have CD. On multivariate analysis, age, gender, indication, gross endoscopic appearance, physician affiliation with a celiac disease center, and absence of a participating trainee were all significantly associated with the performance of duodenal biopsy. There was wide variability among providers, with duodenal biopsy rates ranging from 27% to 91% during these procedures.
CONCLUSIONS
A duodenal biopsy is more likely to be performed in younger patients, females, and for key indications such as weight loss, diarrhea, and anemia. Providers varied widely in the performance of duodenal biopsy. Further study is warranted to better understand the decision to perform duodenal biopsy and to determine the optimal scenarios for its performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29095420
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000957
pmc: PMC5930163
mid: NIHMS909855
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e61-e67

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000040
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):554-60
pubmed: 22341102
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;25(11):1273-8
pubmed: 23995767
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1790-4
pubmed: 15330920
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;13(11):1937-43
pubmed: 25987301
Gastroenterology. 1999 Jun;116(6):1464-86
pubmed: 10348832
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;106(7):1333-9
pubmed: 21364545
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Mar;9(3):214-9
pubmed: 20601132
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Jul;59(7):1509-12
pubmed: 24445731
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Oct-Dec;31(4):354-69
pubmed: 18806595
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):92-5
pubmed: 12838228
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Jan;50(1):47-51
pubmed: 15712636
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Jan;1(1):19-27
pubmed: 15017513
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1082-7
pubmed: 18308317
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):656-76; quiz 677
pubmed: 23609613
Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):219-24
pubmed: 18058655
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug;13(8):1437-43
pubmed: 25818076
Am J Med. 2010 Jun;123(6):528-35
pubmed: 20569759
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2841-6
pubmed: 18759826
Gut. 2011 Oct;60(10):1309-16
pubmed: 21561874
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun;27(6):692-7
pubmed: 25923945
Semin Immunopathol. 2012 Jul;34(4):473-8
pubmed: 22526468
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):818-24
pubmed: 23511460
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 May;58(5):1293-8
pubmed: 23361572
Gastroenterology. 2009 Jul;137(1):88-93
pubmed: 19362553
Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002
pubmed: 17087937
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jan;96(1):126-31
pubmed: 11197241
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):286-92
pubmed: 12578508
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):103-9
pubmed: 21601201
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):779-85
pubmed: 22732871
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;107(10):1538-44; quiz 1537, 1545
pubmed: 22850429

Auteurs

Max Pitman (M)

Celiac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

David S Sanders (DS)

Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Peter H R Green (PHR)

Celiac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

Benjamin Lebwohl (B)

Celiac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH