Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: 5-yr Oncological Outcomes at a Single European Tertiary Cancer Center.


Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 26 07 2017
revised: 05 10 2017
accepted: 16 10 2017
pubmed: 8 11 2017
medline: 23 10 2020
entrez: 8 11 2017
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nowadays, there is a debate about which surgical treatment should be best for clinical T1 renal tumors. If the oncological outcomes are considered, there are many open and laparoscopic series published. As far as robotic series are concerned, only a few of them report 5-yr oncological outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) midterm oncological outcomes achieved in a tertiary robotic reference center. Between April 2009 and September 2013, 123 consecutive patients with clinical T1-stage renal masses underwent RAPN in our tertiary cancer center. Inclusion criteria were as follows: pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and follow-up for >12 mo. Eighteen patients were excluded due to follow-up of <12 mo and 15 due to benign final pathology. Median follow-up was 59 mo (interquartile range 44-73 mo). Patients were followed according to guideline recommendations and institutional protocol. Outcomes were measured by time to disease progression, overall survival, or time to cancer-specific death. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival; log-rank tests were applied for pair-wise comparison of survival. From the 90 patients included, 66 (73.3%) had T1a, 12 (13.3%) T1b, three (3.3%) T2a, and nine (10%) T3a tumors. Predominant histological type was clear cell carcinoma: 67 (74.5%). Fuhrmann grade 1 and 2 was found in 73.3% of all malignant tumors. Two patients (2.2%) had positive surgical margins, and complication rate was 17.8%. Relapse rate was 7.7%, including two cases (2.2%) of local recurrences and five (5.5%) distant metastasis. Five-year disease-free survival was 90.9%, 5-yr cancer-specific survival was 97.5%, and 5-yr overall survival was 95.1%. Midterm oncological outcomes after RAPN for localized RCCs (predominantly T1a tumors of low anatomic complexity) were shown to be good, adding significant evidence to support the oncological efficacy and safety of RAPN for the treatment of this type of tumors. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy seems to be the most promising minimally invasive approach in the treatment of renal masses suitable for organ-sparing surgery as midterm (5 yr) oncological outcomes are excellent.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Nowadays, there is a debate about which surgical treatment should be best for clinical T1 renal tumors. If the oncological outcomes are considered, there are many open and laparoscopic series published. As far as robotic series are concerned, only a few of them report 5-yr oncological outcomes.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to analyze robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) midterm oncological outcomes achieved in a tertiary robotic reference center.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
Between April 2009 and September 2013, 123 consecutive patients with clinical T1-stage renal masses underwent RAPN in our tertiary cancer center. Inclusion criteria were as follows: pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and follow-up for >12 mo. Eighteen patients were excluded due to follow-up of <12 mo and 15 due to benign final pathology. Median follow-up was 59 mo (interquartile range 44-73 mo). Patients were followed according to guideline recommendations and institutional protocol.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
Outcomes were measured by time to disease progression, overall survival, or time to cancer-specific death. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival; log-rank tests were applied for pair-wise comparison of survival.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
From the 90 patients included, 66 (73.3%) had T1a, 12 (13.3%) T1b, three (3.3%) T2a, and nine (10%) T3a tumors. Predominant histological type was clear cell carcinoma: 67 (74.5%). Fuhrmann grade 1 and 2 was found in 73.3% of all malignant tumors. Two patients (2.2%) had positive surgical margins, and complication rate was 17.8%. Relapse rate was 7.7%, including two cases (2.2%) of local recurrences and five (5.5%) distant metastasis. Five-year disease-free survival was 90.9%, 5-yr cancer-specific survival was 97.5%, and 5-yr overall survival was 95.1%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Midterm oncological outcomes after RAPN for localized RCCs (predominantly T1a tumors of low anatomic complexity) were shown to be good, adding significant evidence to support the oncological efficacy and safety of RAPN for the treatment of this type of tumors.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy seems to be the most promising minimally invasive approach in the treatment of renal masses suitable for organ-sparing surgery as midterm (5 yr) oncological outcomes are excellent.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29111154
pii: S2405-4569(17)30242-0
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

636-641

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mihai Dorin Vartolomei (MD)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Romania.

Deliu Victor Matei (DV)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Giuseppe Renne (G)

Department of Laboratory and Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Valeria Maria Tringali (VM)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Nicolae Crisan (N)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Gennaro Musi (G)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Francesco Alessandro Mistretta (FA)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Andrea Russo (A)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Gabriele Cozzi (G)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Giovani Cordima (G)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Stefano Luzzago (S)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Antonio Cioffi (A)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Ettore Di Trapani (E)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Michele Catellani (M)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Maurizio Delor (M)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Danilo Bottero (D)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Ciro Imbimbo (C)

Division of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.

Vincenzo Mirone (V)

Division of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.

Matteo Ferro (M)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: matteo.ferro@ieo.it.

Ottavio de Cobelli (O)

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH