Multiple high-grade gliomas: epidemiology, management, and outcome. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Glioblastoma
High-grade glioma
Multicentric
Multifocal
Multiple cerebral lesions
Systematic review
Journal
Neurosurgical review
ISSN: 1437-2320
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7908181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
05
08
2017
accepted:
31
10
2017
revised:
10
10
2017
pubmed:
16
11
2017
medline:
30
7
2019
entrez:
16
11
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multiple high-grade gliomas (M-HGGs) are well--separated tumors, differentiated as multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) by their MRI features. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature examining epidemiology, clinical and radiological characteristics, management, and the overall survival from M-HGGs. According to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive review of studies published between January 1990 and January 2017 was carried out. The authors identified studies that examined the prevalence rate, clinical and radiological characteristics, treatment, and overall survival from M-HGGs in patients with HGG. Data were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Finally, we systematically reviewed demographic characteristics, lesion location, and surgical and adjuvant treatments. Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review. The M-HGGs prevalence rate was 19% (95% CI 13-26%) and the hazard ratio of death from M-HGGs in the HGGs population was 1.71 (95% CI 1.49-1.95, p < 0.0001). The MC prevalence rate was 6% (CI 95% 4-10%), whereas MF prevalence rate was 11% (CI 95% 6-20%) (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between MF and MC HGGs in gender, lesion location, histological type, and surgical treatment. Survival analysis of MC tumors showed that surgical resection (gross total resection or subtotal resection) is an independent predictor of improved outcome (HR 7.61 for biopsy subgroup, 95% CI 1.94-29.78, p = 0.004). The prevalence of M-HGGs is approximately 20% of HGGs. The clinical relevance of separating M-HGGs in MF and MC tumors remains questionable and its prognostic significance is unclear. When patient status and lesion characteristics make it safe and feasible, cytoreduction should be attempted in patients with M-HGGs because it improves overall survival.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29138949
doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0928-7
pii: 10.1007/s10143-017-0928-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
263-275Références
Surg Neurol. 1999 May;51(5):554-7; discussion 557-8
pubmed: 10321888
J Neurosurg. 1999 Jan;90(1):35-41
pubmed: 10413153
J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):190-8
pubmed: 11780887
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1624-36
pubmed: 12697889
Neurosurg Rev. 2003 Oct;26(4):275-9
pubmed: 12898393
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
J Neurosurg. 2003 Sep;99(3):467-73
pubmed: 12959431
J Neurosurg. 1963 Feb;20:122-36
pubmed: 14192080
Neurosurgery. 2003 Dec;53(6):1377-84; discussion 1384
pubmed: 14633303
Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A(8-9):1328-30
pubmed: 1515244
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
J Neurosurg. 2005 Apr;102(4):622-8
pubmed: 15871503
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1990 Aug;30(8):604-9
pubmed: 1703639
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):820-4
pubmed: 17499453
Neuro Oncol. 2007 Oct;9(4):424-9
pubmed: 17622647
Neurosurgery. 2008 Apr;62(4):753-64; discussion 264-6
pubmed: 18496181
P R Health Sci J. 2009 Mar;28(1):75-9
pubmed: 19266744
Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;89(9):873-80
pubmed: 19723669
Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;71(1):20-5
pubmed: 20175026
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72
pubmed: 20231676
J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):576-84
pubmed: 20690813
Neuro Oncol. 2011 Apr;13(4):428-36
pubmed: 21363881
Neuro Oncol. 2011 Dec;13(12):1339-48
pubmed: 21914639
World Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;76(6):572-9
pubmed: 22251506
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;114(7):840-5
pubmed: 22377333
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2012 Apr;23(2):343-50, x
pubmed: 22440877
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2012 Sep;23(5):211-5
pubmed: 22858053
J Neurosurg. 2012 Oct;117(4):705-11
pubmed: 22920963
J Neurosurg. 2012 Nov;117(5):851-9
pubmed: 22978537
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117(6):1032-8
pubmed: 23039151
J Neurosurg. 2013 Apr;118(4):786-98
pubmed: 23176331
J Neurooncol. 2013 Mar;112(1):91-7
pubmed: 23354652
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Jun;155(6):973-80
pubmed: 23459867
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 15;19(18):5146-57
pubmed: 23918605
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2014 Apr;31(2):113-7
pubmed: 23934332
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Dec;155(12):2245-51
pubmed: 24105045
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24(12):3117-23
pubmed: 24130262
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Jul;15(7):455-65
pubmed: 24946761
J Neurooncol. 2014 Sep;119(2):429-35
pubmed: 24990827
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):384-9
pubmed: 25841623
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Oct;130(4):587-97
pubmed: 26323991
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 8;7(10):11526-38
pubmed: 26863628
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Sep;31:92-8
pubmed: 27343042
J Neurooncol. 2016 Sep;129(3):471-478
pubmed: 27412000
Pathobiology. 2017;84(2):99-107
pubmed: 27553586
Neurosurgery. 2016 Dec;79(6):N12-N13
pubmed: 27861406
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Mar;159(3):403-418
pubmed: 28093610
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Eur J Radiol. 1993 Apr;16(3):163-70
pubmed: 8389708