Fast and Sensitive: Automated Point-of-Care Urine Dips.
Journal
Pediatric emergency care
ISSN: 1535-1815
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Emerg Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8507560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
1
12
2017
medline:
29
5
2021
entrez:
1
12
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Point-of-care (POC) urine dipstick is a highly used test in the pediatric emergency department (PED) owing to its fast turn-around time and inexpensive cost. Past studies have shown hand-held urine dipsticks and automated urinalysis in children younger than 48 months to be sensitive predictors for urinary tract infection (UTI). It is hypothesized that POC dip testing is as accurate as laboratory urinalysis in the diagnosis of UTI. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients (aged birth through 18 years) presenting to a PED between January 2015 and December 2015. Eligible subjects included those that had a POC dip, laboratory urinalysis (lab UA), and urine culture performed during their PED visit. Subjects were selected, using a random number generator; 334 charts were selected. A positive POC dip was defined as having a positive leukocyte esterase or the presence of nitrites. A positive lab UA was defined as having a positive leukocyte esterase, nitrites, or greater than 10 white blood cells per high-power field. Urine culture was used as the criterion standard for comparison. A total of 334 subjects' charts were reviewed. Sensitivity and specificity of the POC dip were 91.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.9%-98.2%) and 63.9% (95% CI, 57.2%-69.3%); lab UA, 91.4% (95% CI, 76.9%-98.2%) and 63.9% (95% CI, 58.2%-69.3%); and lab dip, 88.6% (95% CI, 73.3%-96.8%) and 65.6% (95% CI, 59.9%-70.9%). Point-of-care dips are as sensitive in detecting UTI as the lab UA. A prospective study could allow for further demographic evaluation of POC dip diagnosed UTI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29189595
doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001357
pii: 00006565-202010000-00007
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Nitrites
0
leukocyte esterase
EC 3.1.-
Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases
EC 3.1.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
486-488Références
Zorc JJ, Kiddoo DA, Shaw KN. Diagnosis and management of pediatric urinary tract infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:417–422.
Shaw KN, Gorelick M, McGowan KL, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in febrile young children in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 1998;102:e16.
Kanagaye JT, Jacob JM, Malicki D. Automated urinalysis and urine dipstick in the emergency evaluation of young febrile children. Pediatrics. 2014;134:523–529.
Shaw KN, Hexter D, McGowan KL, et al. Clinical evaluation of a rapid screening test for urinary tract infections in children. J Pediatr. 1991;118:733–736.
Roberts K. Revised AAP guideline on UTI in febrile infants and young children. Am Fam Physician. 2012;86:940–946.
Shang YJ, Wang QQ, Zhang JR, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of flow cytometry in urinary tract infection screening. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;424:90–95.
Shaw KN, McGowan KL, Gorelick MH, et al. Screening for urinary tract infection in infants in the emergency department: which test is best?Pediatrics. 1998;101:E1.
Lammers RL, Gibson S, Kovacs D, et al. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:505–551.
Middelkoop SJ, van Pelt LJ, Kampinga GA, et al. Routine tests and automated urinalysis in patients with suspected urinary tract infection at the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:1528–1534.
Hoberman A, Wald ER, Reynolds EA, et al. Pyuria and bacteriuria in urine specimens obtained by catheter from young children with fever. J Pediatr. 1994;124:513–519.
Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection. Reaffirmation of AAP Clinical Practice Guideline: the diagnosis and management of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children 2–24 months of age. Pediatrics. 2016;138.
Young JL, Soper DE. Urinalysis and urinary tract infection: update for clinicians. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2001;9:249–255.