Upper-Body Strength Measures and Pop-Up Performance of Stronger and Weaker Surfers.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
15
12
2017
medline:
27
1
2021
entrez:
15
12
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Parsonage, J, Secomb, JL, Sheppard, JM, Ferrier, BK, Dowse, RA, and Nimphius, S. Upper-body strength measures and pop-up performance of stronger and weaker surfers. J Strength Cond Res 34(10): 2982-2989, 2020-The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of the isometric push-up (IPU), dynamic push-up (DPU), and force plate pop-up (FP POP) as measures of upper-body isometric and dynamic strength qualities in surfing athletes. Furthermore, the study aimed to compare pop-up performance between stronger and weaker surfers. Eighteen female (n = 9) and male (n = 9) surfers (age = 28.1 ± 6.4 years, mass = 69.6 ± 10.4 kg, and height = 172.5 ± 6.7 cm) completed a battery of upper-body strength assessments, of which exhibited high between-day reliability: IPU, (coefficient of variation [CV%] = 4.7, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96), DPU (CV% = 5.0, ICC = 0.90), and FP POP (CV% = 4.4, ICC = 0.90). Participants were subsequently split into stronger (n = 9) and weaker (n = 9) surfers based on normalized peak force (PF) attained in the IPU. Pop-up performance was measured both in the water and during the FP POP and was referred to as time to pop-up (TTP). Significant between-group differences were observed for normalized PF during IPU (d = 1.59, p < 0.01) and DPU (d = 0.94 p = 0.04). Although not significant, there was a large magnitude difference in FP POP (d = 0.80, p = 0.08) and FP TTP (d = 0.85, p = 0.07). Significant correlations were identified between normalized IPU PF and normalized DPU FP (r = 0.69, p = 0.03) and FP TTP (r = 0.73, p = 0.02) in the stronger group. The weaker group exhibited a significant inverse correlation between normalized IPU PF and in-water TTP (r = -0.77, p < 0.01). The results suggest improvements in pop-up performance may be elicited by improving dynamic strength for stronger surfers, whereas pop-up performance in weaker surfers may be elicited by improving maximum strength. The upper-body strength assessments provided a novel insight into strength qualities that are associated with in-water performance of surfers (TTP).
Identifiants
pubmed: 29239996
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002377
pii: 00124278-202010000-00033
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2982-2989Références
Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26: 217–238, 1998.
Baiget E, Corbi F, Fuentes JP, Fernández-Fernández J. The relationship between maximum isometric strength and ball velocity in the tennis serve. J Hum Kinet 53: 63–71, 2016.
Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon B. Generality versus specificity: A comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Phys 68: 350–355, 1994.
Beckham G, Mizuguchi S, Carter C, Sato K, Ramsey M, Lamont H, Hornsby G, Haff GG, Stone M. Relationships of isometric mid-thigh pull variables to weightlifting performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 53: 573–581, 2013.
Bellar D, Marcus L, Judge LW. Validation and reliability of a novel test of upper body isometric strength. J Hum Kinet 47: 189–195, 2015.
Brown LE, Weir JP. ASEP procedures recommendation I: Accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. J Exerc Physiol Online 4: 1–21, 2001.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
Comfort P, Jones PA, McMahon JJ, Newton R. Effect of knee and trunk angle on kinetic variables during the isometric mid-thigh pull: Test-retest reliability. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 10: 58–63, 2014.
Cormack SJ, Newton RU, McGuigan MR, Doyle TL. Reliability of measures obtained during single and repeated countermovement jumps. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 3: 131–144, 2008.
Das B, Forde M. Isometric push-up and pull-down strengths of paraplegics in the workspace: 1. Strength measurement profiles. J Occup Rehabil 9: 277–289, 1999.
Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30: 1–15, 2000.
Hopkins WG. How to interpret changes in athletic performance tests. Sports Sci 8: 1–7, 2004.
Kilduff LP, Vidakovic P, Cooney G, Twycross-Lewis R, Amuna P, Parker M, Paul L, Pitsiladis YP. Effects of creatine on isometric bench-press performance in resistance-trained humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 1176–1183, 2002.
Koch J, Riemann BL, Davies GJ. Ground reaction force patterns in plyometric push-ups. J Strength Cond Res 26: 2220–2227, 2012.
Loveless DJ, Minahan C. Peak aerobic power and paddling efficiency in recreational and competitive junior male surfers. Eur J Appl Physiol 10: 407–415, 2010.
McGuigan MR, Cormack SJ, Gill ND. Strength and power profiling of athletes: Selecting tests and how to use the information for program design. Strength Cond 35: 7–14, 2013.
McGuigan MR, Newton MJ, Winchester JB, Nelson AG. Relationship between isometric and dynamic strength in recreationally trained men. J Strength Cond Res 24: 2570–2573, 2010.
Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ. Poor correlations between isometric tests and dynamic performance: Relationship to muscle activation. Eur J Appl Physiol 73: 353–357, 1996.
Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ, Pryor JF, Newton RU. Isometric assessment of muscular function: The effect of joint angle. J Appl Biomech 11: 205–215, 2010.
Newton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ, Wilson GJ, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Phys 75: 333–342, 1997.
Parsonage J, Secomb JL, Sheppard JM, Ferrier BK, Dowse RA, Nimphius S. The isometric push up: What degree of elbow flexion elicits the greatest peak force. J Aust Strength Cond 24: 46, 2016.
Secomb JL, Lundgren LE, Farley OR, Tran TT, Nimphius S, Sheppard JM. Relationships between lower-body muscle structure and lower-body strength, power, and muscle-tendon complex stiffness. J Strength Cond Res 29: 2221–2228, 2015.
Shechtman O. The coefficient of variation as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength, part II: Sensitivity and specificity. J Hand Ther 14: 188–194, 2001.
Sheppard J, McNamara P, Osborne M, Andrews M, Chapman D. Strength a strong predictor of paddling performance in competitive surfers. J Aust Strength Cond 20: 39–42, 2012.
Stone MH, Sanborn K, O'Bryant HS, Hartman M, Stone ME, Proulx C, Ward B, Hruby J. Maximum strength-power-performance relationships in collegiate throwers. J Strength Cond Res 17: 739–745, 2003.
Stone MH, Sands WA, Carlock J, Callan S, Dickie D, Daigle K, Cotton J, Smith SL, Hartman M. The importance of isometric maximum strength and peak rate-of-force development in sprint cycling. J Strength Cond Res 18: 878–884, 2004.
Suprak DN, Dawes J, Stephenson MD. The effect of position on the percentage of body mass supported during traditional and modified push-up variants. J Strength Cond Res 25: 497–503, 2011.
Wang R, Hoffman JR, Sadres E, Bartolomei S, Muddle TW, Fukuda DH, Stout JR. Evaluating upper-body strength and power from a single test: The ballistic push-up. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1338–1345, 2017.
West DJ, Owen NJ, Jones MR, Bracken RM, Cook CJ, Cunningham DJ, Shearer DA, Finn CV, Newton RU, Crewther BT. Relationships between force–time characteristics of the isometric midthigh pull and dynamic performance in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 25: 3070–3075, 2011.
Young KP, Haff GG, Newton RU, Sheppard JM. Reliability of a novel testing protocol to assess upper body strength qualities in elite athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9: 871–875, 2014.