Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial lengths of myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children.
Adolescent
Anterior Eye Segment
/ diagnostic imaging
Axial Length, Eye
/ diagnostic imaging
Biometry
/ methods
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emmetropia
/ physiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hyperopia
/ diagnosis
Male
Myopia
/ diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Refraction, Ocular
/ physiology
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Visual Acuity
Anterior segment parameters
Axial length
Optical biometry
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
30
03
2017
accepted:
15
12
2017
pubmed:
30
12
2017
medline:
9
4
2019
entrez:
30
12
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the anterior segment parameters of myopic, hyperopic, and emmetropic children by using optical biometry. This prospective cross-sectional study included 150 eyes of 150 children between 6 and 16 years old. The eyes were divided into three groups according to their spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error values as myopic [between - 1.0 and - 6.0 diopter (D)], emmetropic (between + 0.50 and - 0.50 D), and hyperopic (between + 1. 0 and + 3.0 D). Axial length (AL), central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and mean keratometry (K mean) measurements were obtained by an optical biometry (LenStar LS 900, Haag Streit Diagnostics) were compared between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences regarding the ages and genders of the participants between the groups (p > 0.05). The mean SE refractive error values were - 2.20 ± 0.71 D in myopic, - 0.08 ± 0.49 D in emmetropic, and + 2.06 ± 0.53 D in hyperopic eyes. The mean AL values were 24.50 ± 0.69, 23.41 ± 0.61, and 22.33 ± 0.61 mm, respectively, in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes (p < 0.001). The mean ACD values were 3.94 ± 0.22, 3.78 ± 0.23, and 3.45 ± 0.20 mm, respectively, in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes (p < 0.001). The mean LT values were 3.56 ± 0.20, 3.43 ± 0.17, and 3.31 ± 0.12 mm, respectively, in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the groups. Refractive errors are the main factors those affect anterior segment parameters and AL in children and the most severely affected parameters were found to be the AL, ACD, and LT values.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29285706
doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0816-8
pii: 10.1007/s10792-017-0816-8
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
335-340Références
Vision Res. 1999 Apr;39(8):1415-35
pubmed: 10343811
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Aug;41(9):2486-94
pubmed: 10937558
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 May;85(5):521-6
pubmed: 11316705
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Apr;26(4):355-63
pubmed: 12843892
Eye (Lond). 2006 Sep;20(9):1021-4
pubmed: 16096655
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun;48(6):2510-9
pubmed: 17525178
Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):739-46, 746.e1-4
pubmed: 19243832
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;93(6):807-10
pubmed: 19289385
J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;72(3):133-7
pubmed: 19299220
Clin Exp Optom. 2009 Nov;92(6):476-81
pubmed: 19723124
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Mar;51(3):1341-7
pubmed: 19875656
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan;117(1):140-147.e3
pubmed: 19926137
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):230-4
pubmed: 20152602
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Jul;30(4):321-38
pubmed: 20629956
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):194-8
pubmed: 20853265
Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):284-93
pubmed: 20888047
Ophthalmologica. 2011;225(3):127-34
pubmed: 20948239
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011 Feb;34(1):26-31
pubmed: 21081280
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Dec;37(12):2175-80
pubmed: 22015040
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2013 Jan-Feb;50(1):37-43
pubmed: 22966784
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:601-6
pubmed: 23576859
Ophthalmology. 2013 Oct;120(10):2109-16
pubmed: 23953098
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2211-2
pubmed: 24298478
Eye (Lond). 2014 Feb;28(2):180-8
pubmed: 24336296
Eye (Lond). 2014 Feb;28(2):169-79
pubmed: 24406411
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 May-Jun;77(3):152-4
pubmed: 25295900
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;62(9):931-4
pubmed: 25370395
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:538283
pubmed: 25431789
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0117481
pubmed: 25658095
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0111766
pubmed: 25693186
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015 Jul-Sep;10(3):214-20
pubmed: 26730304
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):146
pubmed: 27549766
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 23;12(1):e0170030
pubmed: 28114313
Vision Res. 1988;28(5):639-57
pubmed: 3195068
Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18(2):175-87
pubmed: 9021311
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997 Nov;23(9):1356-70
pubmed: 9423908