Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications.
Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Conscious Sedation
/ adverse effects
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
/ adverse effects
Female
Germany
/ epidemiology
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
/ adverse effects
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Middle Aged
Propofol
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Registries
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Young Adult
cardiovascular complications
gastrointesinal endoscopy
Journal
Gut
ISSN: 1468-3288
Titre abrégé: Gut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985108R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
05
11
2015
revised:
22
11
2017
accepted:
28
11
2017
pubmed:
5
1
2018
medline:
14
7
2020
entrez:
5
1
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sedation has been established for GI endoscopic procedures in most countries, but it is also associated with an added risk of complications. Reported complication rates are variable due to different study methodologies and often limited sample size. Acute sedation-associated complications were prospectively recorded in an electronic endoscopy documentation in 39 study centres between December 2011 and August 2014 (median inclusion period 24 months). The sedation regimen was decided by each study centre. A total of 368 206 endoscopies was recorded; 11% without sedation. Propofol was the dominant drug used (62% only, 22.5% in combination with midazolam). Of the sedated patients, 38 (0.01%) suffered a major complication, and overall mortality was 0.005% (n=15); minor complications occurred in 0.3%. Multivariate analysis showed the following independent risk factors for all complications: American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (OR 2.29) and type and duration of endoscopy. Of the sedation regimens, propofol monosedation had the lowest rate (OR 0.75) compared with midazolam (reference) and combinations (OR 1.0-1.5). Compared with primary care hospitals, tertiary referral centres had higher complication rates (OR 1.61). Notably, compared with sedation by a two-person endoscopy team (endoscopist/assistant; 53.5% of all procedures), adding another person for sedation (nurse, physician) was associated with higher complication rates (ORs 1.40-4.46), probably due to higher complexity of procedures not evident in the multivariate analysis. This large multicentre registry study confirmed that severe acute sedation-related complications are rare during GI endoscopy with a very low mortality. The data are useful for planning risk factor-adapted sedation management to further prevent sedation-associated complications in selected patients. DRKS00007768; Pre-results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29298872
pii: gutjnl-2015-311037
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311037
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Propofol
YI7VU623SF
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
445-452Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.