High Isotropic Resolution T2 Mapping of the Lumbosacral Plexus with T2-Prepared 3D Turbo Spin Echo.
Lumbosacral plexus
Magnetic resonance neurography
Nerve roots
Reproducibility
Three-dimensional T2 mapping
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2017
accepted:
18
12
2017
pubmed:
13
1
2018
medline:
31
12
2019
entrez:
12
1
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Isotropic high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used to depict even small and highly oblique nerves of the lumbosacral plexus (LSP). The present study introduces a T2 mapping sequence (T2-prepared 3D turbo spin echo) that is B1-insensitive and enables quantitative assessment of LSP nerves. In this study 15 healthy subjects (mean age 28.5 ± 3.8 years) underwent 3 T MRN of the LSP area three times. The T2 values were calculated offline on a voxel-by-voxel basis and measured at three segments (preganglionic, ganglionic, postganglionic) of three LSP nerves (S1, L5, L4) by two independent investigators (experienced and novice). Normative data for the different nerves were extracted and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess reproducibility and interobserver reliability of T2 measurements. The T2 mapping showed excellent reproducibility with ICCs ranging between 0.99 (S1 preganglionic) and 0.89 (L5 postganglionic). Interobserver reliability was less robust with ICCs ranging between 0.78 (S1 preganglionic) and 0.44 (L5 postganglionic) for S1 and L5. A mean T2 value of 74.6 ± 4.7 ms was registered for preganglionic segments, 84.7 ± 4.1 ms for ganglionic and 65.4 ± 2.5 ms for postganglionic segments, respectively. There was a statistically significant variation of T2 values across the nerve (preganglionic vs ganglionic vs postganglionic) for S1, L5, and L4. Our approach enables isotropic high-resolution and B1-insensitive T2 mapping of LSP nerves with excellent reproducibility. It might reflect a robust and clinically useful method for future diagnostics of LSP pathologies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29322233
doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0658-9
pii: 10.1007/s00062-017-0658-9
pmc: PMC6579865
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
223-230Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Mar;25(3):431-40
pubmed: 15037469
J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;112(2):362-71
pubmed: 19663545
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 May;32(5):821-7
pubmed: 21474625
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):583-91
pubmed: 21862800
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1792-9
pubmed: 22705377
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):486-97
pubmed: 22976233
NMR Biomed. 2013 Jun;26(6):630-7
pubmed: 23208676
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(2):111-9
pubmed: 23666153
Radiographics. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):967-87
pubmed: 23842967
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):745-67
pubmed: 24399498
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):1672-7
pubmed: 25638217
Neurology. 2015 Apr 28;84(17):1782-7
pubmed: 25841030
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):498-504
pubmed: 25850359
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):789-99
pubmed: 26454005
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;23(4):533-45
pubmed: 26499273
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Jan 15;360:170-5
pubmed: 26723995
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):2158-2162
pubmed: 27390317
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0171337
pubmed: 28196133
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):407-415
pubmed: 28261861