Association between community socioeconomic characteristics and access to youth flag football.


Journal

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention
ISSN: 1475-5785
Titre abrégé: Inj Prev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9510056

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 24 11 2017
revised: 22 12 2017
accepted: 27 12 2017
pubmed: 14 1 2018
medline: 24 3 2020
entrez: 14 1 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended that opportunities for non-tackling American football (e.g., flag football) be expanded, given concerns about the risks of brain trauma from tackle football. This study tested the hypothesis that flag football would be more accessible in communities characterised by higher socioeconomic status residents. In July 2017, the locations of community-based organisations offering youth flag and tackle football for youth between the ages of 6 and 13 in two US states (Georgia and Washington) were aggregated (n=440). Organisations were coded in terms of the availability of tackle and/or flag football teams for youth at each year of age between 6 and 13. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the odds of a community-based football organisation offering flag football, by community socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. In both states, communities with more educated residents were more likely to offer flag football for youth aged 6-12. For example, among 6 year-olds every 10% increase in the number of adult residents with a college education was associated with 1.51 times the odds of flag football availability (95% CI 1.22 to 1.86, P<0.001). These results suggest that youth living in communities characterised by low educational attainment are less likely than other youth to have the option of a lower contact alternative to tackle football. Relying on voluntary community-level adoption of lower contact alternatives to tackle football may result in inequitable access to such sport options. This may contribute to an inequitable burden of brain trauma from youth sport.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended that opportunities for non-tackling American football (e.g., flag football) be expanded, given concerns about the risks of brain trauma from tackle football. This study tested the hypothesis that flag football would be more accessible in communities characterised by higher socioeconomic status residents.
METHODS
In July 2017, the locations of community-based organisations offering youth flag and tackle football for youth between the ages of 6 and 13 in two US states (Georgia and Washington) were aggregated (n=440). Organisations were coded in terms of the availability of tackle and/or flag football teams for youth at each year of age between 6 and 13. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the odds of a community-based football organisation offering flag football, by community socioeconomic and demographic characteristics.
RESULTS
In both states, communities with more educated residents were more likely to offer flag football for youth aged 6-12. For example, among 6 year-olds every 10% increase in the number of adult residents with a college education was associated with 1.51 times the odds of flag football availability (95% CI 1.22 to 1.86, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
These results suggest that youth living in communities characterised by low educational attainment are less likely than other youth to have the option of a lower contact alternative to tackle football. Relying on voluntary community-level adoption of lower contact alternatives to tackle football may result in inequitable access to such sport options. This may contribute to an inequitable burden of brain trauma from youth sport.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29330199
pii: injuryprev-2017-042677
doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042677
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

278-282

Informations de copyright

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Emily Kroshus (E)

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Aly J Sonnen (AJ)

University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, USA.

Sara Pd Chrisman (SP)

Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Frederick P Rivara (FP)

Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH