Implementation of additional prescribing authorization among oncology pharmacists in Alberta.
Adult
Alberta
Ambulatory Care
/ organization & administration
Antiemetics
/ therapeutic use
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug Prescriptions
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Medication Reconciliation
Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Perception
Pharmaceutical Services
/ organization & administration
Pharmacists
/ organization & administration
Professional Role
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Pharmacist
oncology
prescribing
Journal
Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners
ISSN: 1477-092X
Titre abrégé: J Oncol Pharm Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9511372
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
18
1
2018
medline:
9
4
2019
entrez:
18
1
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe the practice settings and prescribing practices of oncology pharmacists with additional prescribing authorization. A descriptive, cross-sectional survey of all oncology pharmacists in Alberta was conducted using a web-based questionnaire over four weeks between March and April 2016. Pharmacists were identified from the Cancer Services Pharmacy Directory and leadership staff in Alberta Health Services. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the practice setting, prescribing practices, motivators to apply for additional prescribing authorization, and the facilitators and barriers of prescribing. Logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with having additional prescribing authorization. The overall response rate was 41% (71 of 175 pharmacists). Oncology pharmacists with additional prescribing authorization made up 38% of respondents. They primarily worked in urban, tertiary cancer centers, and practiced in ambulatory care. The top 3 clinical activities they participated in were medication reconciliation, medication counseling/education, and ambulatory patient assessment. Respondents thought additional prescribing authorization was most useful for ambulatory patient assessment and follow-up. Antiemetics were prescribed the most often. The median number of prescriptions written in an average week of clinical work was 5. Competence, self-confidence, and the potential impact on patient care/perceived impact on work environment were the strongest facilitators of prescribing. The strongest motivators to apply for additional prescribing authorization were relevancy to practice, the potential for increased efficiency, and advancing the profession. The current majority of oncology pharmacist prescribing in Alberta occurs in ambulatory care with a large focus on antiemetic prescribing. Pharmacists found additional prescribing authorization most useful for ambulatory patient assessment and follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29338572
doi: 10.1177/1078155217752076
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiemetics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM