Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.
colonic adenomas
colonoscopy
colorectal adenomas
colorectal cancer
colorectal cancer screening
Journal
Gut
ISSN: 1468-3288
Titre abrégé: Gut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985108R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
19
07
2017
revised:
12
12
2017
accepted:
14
12
2017
pubmed:
25
1
2018
medline:
19
1
2019
entrez:
25
1
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Low adenoma detection rates (ADR) are linked to increased postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates and reduced cancer survival. Devices to enhance mucosal visualisation such as Endocuff Vision (EV) may improve ADR. This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared ADR between EV-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC). Patients referred because of symptoms, surveillance or following a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBt) as part of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme were recruited from seven hospitals. ADR, mean adenomas per procedure, size and location of adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, EV removal rate, caecal intubation rate, procedural time, patient experience, effect of EV on workload and adverse events were measured. 1772 patients (57% male, mean age 62 years) were recruited over 16 months with 45% recruited through screening. EAC increased ADR globally from 36.2% to 40.9% (P=0.02). The increase was driven by a 10.8% increase in FOBt-positive screening patients (50.9% SC vs 61.7% EAC, P<0.001). EV patients had higher detection of mean adenomas per procedure, sessile serrated polyps, left-sided, diminutive, small adenomas and cancers (cancer 4.1% vs 2.3%, P=0.02). EV removal rate was 4.1%. Median intubation was a minute quicker with EAC (P=0.001), with no difference in caecal intubation rate or withdrawal time. EAC was well tolerated but caused a minor increase in discomfort on anal intubation in patients undergoing colonoscopy with no or minimal sedation. There were no significant EV adverse events. EV significantly improved ADR in bowel cancer screening patients and should be used to improve colonoscopic detection. NCT02552017, Results; ISRCTN11821044, Results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29363535
pii: gutjnl-2017-314889
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889
pmc: PMC6352411
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN11821044']
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02552017']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
280-288Informations de copyright
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: CJR has received research grants from ARC Medical, Olympus Medical, Aquilant Endoscopy, Norgine and travel grants from Boston Scientific and Cook Medical. He is an advisory board member for Ai4Gi. BPS has received speaker grants from Olympus Medical and research support from Norgine, Aquilant and Diagmed. He is an advisory board member for Creo Medical. ZPT was a non-paid speaker for Norgine Pharmaceutical. He has received research and educational grants from Norgine Pharmaceutical and medical equipment support from Olympus. He holds a Consultant Agreement for Creo Medical.
Références
Gut. 2002 Oct;51 Suppl 5:V6-9
pubmed: 12221031
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50
pubmed: 16454841
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jan;132(1):96-102
pubmed: 17241863
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803
pubmed: 20463339
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):456-63
pubmed: 20950801
Stat Med. 2011 Apr 30;30(9):922-34
pubmed: 21284014
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD008211
pubmed: 21328306
Gut. 2012 Jul;61(7):1050-7
pubmed: 21940723
Cancer. 2012 Jun 15;118(12):3044-52
pubmed: 21989586
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):561-7
pubmed: 22341103
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Dec;14(12):1538-45
pubmed: 22540766
Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):917-22
pubmed: 22893135
Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):20-6
pubmed: 23254403
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb;77(2):255-61
pubmed: 23317691
Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):957-63
pubmed: 23744612
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 7;20(9):2200-11
pubmed: 24605019
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306
pubmed: 24693890
Endoscopy. 2014 Jul;46(7):610-4
pubmed: 24824090
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 May-Jun;49(5):413-8
pubmed: 24921209
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724
pubmed: 25135006
Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):225-31
pubmed: 25268309
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 03;9(12):e114267
pubmed: 25470133
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445
pubmed: 26674360
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Feb;4(2):E205-12
pubmed: 26878051
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1923-1929
pubmed: 27531829
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):2045-2060
pubmed: 27802153
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):232-240
pubmed: 28082115
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):280-287
pubmed: 28412271
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1043-1050
pubmed: 28614895