Broad-spectrum physical fitness benefits of recreational football: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
football
health promotion
physical fitness
Journal
British journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1473-0480
Titre abrégé: Br J Sports Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0432520
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
accepted:
31
12
2017
pubmed:
27
1
2018
medline:
30
11
2019
entrez:
27
1
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A previous meta-analysis showed that maximal oxygen uptake increased by 3.51 mL/kg/min (95% CI 3.07 to 4.15) during a recreational football programme of 3-6 months in comparison with continuous moderate-intensity running, strength training or a passive control group. In addition, narrative reviews have demonstrated beneficial effects of recreational football on physical fitness and health status. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the magnitude of effects of recreational football on blood pressure, body composition, lipid profile and muscular fitness with reference to age, gender and health status. Systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Google Scholar were searched prior to 1 February 2017. In addition, Google Scholar alerts were set up in January 2012 to identify potential papers with the following key terms: recreational football, recreational soccer, street football and street soccer. Randomised and matched controlled trials with participants allocated to a recreational football group or any other type of exercises or passive control group were included. Training programmes had to last at least 2 weeks to meet the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measures were blood pressure, resting heart rate, body composition, muscular fitness, and blood lipids and glucose tolerance. A total of 31 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included. The effect of recreational football on systolic blood pressure (SBP) versus no-exercise controls was The present meta-analysis demonstrated multiple broad-spectrum benefits of recreational football on health-related physical fitness compared with no-exercise controls, including improvements in blood pressure, resting heart rate, fat mass, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and CMJ performance. Additionally, recreational football is efficient and effective as Zumba and continuous running exercise regimens with highlighted social, motivational and competitive components.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A previous meta-analysis showed that maximal oxygen uptake increased by 3.51 mL/kg/min (95% CI 3.07 to 4.15) during a recreational football programme of 3-6 months in comparison with continuous moderate-intensity running, strength training or a passive control group. In addition, narrative reviews have demonstrated beneficial effects of recreational football on physical fitness and health status.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the magnitude of effects of recreational football on blood pressure, body composition, lipid profile and muscular fitness with reference to age, gender and health status.
DESIGN
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
METHODS
MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Google Scholar were searched prior to 1 February 2017. In addition, Google Scholar alerts were set up in January 2012 to identify potential papers with the following key terms: recreational football, recreational soccer, street football and street soccer.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
METHODS
Randomised and matched controlled trials with participants allocated to a recreational football group or any other type of exercises or passive control group were included. Training programmes had to last at least 2 weeks to meet the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measures were blood pressure, resting heart rate, body composition, muscular fitness, and blood lipids and glucose tolerance. A total of 31 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The effect of recreational football on systolic blood pressure (SBP) versus no-exercise controls was
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The present meta-analysis demonstrated multiple broad-spectrum benefits of recreational football on health-related physical fitness compared with no-exercise controls, including improvements in blood pressure, resting heart rate, fat mass, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and CMJ performance. Additionally, recreational football is efficient and effective as Zumba and continuous running exercise regimens with highlighted social, motivational and competitive components.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29371223
pii: bjsports-2017-097885
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097885
pmc: PMC6662951
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Glucose
0
Lipids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
926-939Informations de copyright
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(6):787-803
pubmed: 10495260
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006 Feb;16 Suppl 1:3-63
pubmed: 16451303
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1106-10
pubmed: 18483053
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):3-13
pubmed: 19092709
Br J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;43(11):825-31
pubmed: 19098116
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665
pubmed: 19454737
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94
pubmed: 19622512
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:72-9
pubmed: 20136764
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:50-7
pubmed: 20136765
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:14-23
pubmed: 20149143
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:80-9
pubmed: 20210904
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:40-9
pubmed: 20210906
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:98-102
pubmed: 20210907
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:1-13
pubmed: 20210908
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:31-9
pubmed: 20210909
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20 Suppl 1:58-71
pubmed: 20546545
J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Nov;24(4 Suppl):27-35
pubmed: 20923918
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jun;112(6):2097-106
pubmed: 21956486
Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Aug;31(4):970-86
pubmed: 22397814
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Mar;45(3):553-60
pubmed: 23059865
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 16;8(9):e73182
pubmed: 24066036
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Dec;24(6):990-9
pubmed: 24151956
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(16):1539-49
pubmed: 24720526
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:86-97
pubmed: 24902992
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:27-35
pubmed: 24903081
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:76-85
pubmed: 24903323
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:43-56
pubmed: 24903461
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:36-42
pubmed: 24944131
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:105-12
pubmed: 24944134
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:122-9
pubmed: 24944136
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;49(7):434-40
pubmed: 25568330
Br J Sports Med. 2015 May;49(9):568-76
pubmed: 25878072
Sports Med. 2015 Sep;45(9):1339-1353
pubmed: 26210229
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Dec;115(12):2671-9
pubmed: 26255288
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 25;10(8):e0135319
pubmed: 26305880
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Apr;27(4):1507-1518
pubmed: 26572756
J Sports Sci. 2016 Oct;34(19):1849-58
pubmed: 26849477
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148236
pubmed: 26886262
J Sports Sci. 2016 Oct;34(19):1822-9
pubmed: 26890580
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jun;116(6):1127-38
pubmed: 27068158
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Dec;27(12):1893-1901
pubmed: 28124381
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jan;118(1):11-32
pubmed: 29164325