Cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma drainage implants: the hooked tube technique.


Journal

International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 19 09 2017
accepted: 01 02 2018
pubmed: 15 2 2018
medline: 9 4 2019
entrez: 15 2 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cataract surgery has been reported to adversely affect the IOP control in eyes with the glaucoma drainage implant (GDI). One reason might be the flow of lens debris/viscoelastic material through the GDI tube into the bleb. This pilot study was conducted to determine the clinical results of a novel technique for temporary occlusion of the GDI tube with an iris retractor hook during phacoemulsification. Retrospective analysis of 15 patients (control group) who underwent phacoemulsification between January 2005 and December 2010 and 17 patients (treatment group) who underwent phacoemulsification with the hooked tube technique between January 2011 and April 2016 with a minimum 1-year follow-up. The IOP remained within 4 mmHg of the preoperative level in all eyes of the treatment group. Three eyes exhibited IOP spikes (≥ 10 mmHg) among controls. The mean postoperative IOP at 1 month was statistically significantly increased in the control group compared with the treatment group (P = 0.040). The number of antiglaucoma medications at 3 and 6 months was significantly increased in the control group (1.4 ± 1.1 vs. 1.7 ± 1.1; P = 0.041, 1.4 ± 1.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2; P = 0.017, respectively). After phacoemulsification, there was a significant increase in the mean number of antiglaucoma medications used at 6 months in the control group compared with the treatment group (P = 0.049). In both groups, one eye developed corneal decompensation. The hooked tube technique seems to provide an effective way to reduce the risk of the IOP spikes after cataract surgery in eyes with GDI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29442246
doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0852-z
pii: 10.1007/s10792-018-0852-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

605-610

Références

Eye (Lond). 2005 Dec;19(12):1342-3
pubmed: 15565187
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;140(5):911-3
pubmed: 16310471
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jun;32(6):1011-4
pubmed: 16814061
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Sep;32(9):1489-91
pubmed: 16931260
Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jun 15;111(6):776-7
pubmed: 2039057
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):804-814.e1
pubmed: 22244522
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):789-803.e2
pubmed: 22245458

Auteurs

Juha Välimäki (J)

Department of Ophthalmology, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, PHHYKY, Keskussairaalankatu 7, 15850, Lahti, Finland. juha.valimaki@phhyky.fi.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH