In Vivo Molecular Profiling of Human Glioma : Cross-Sectional Observational Study Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Brain Neoplasms
/ blood supply
Cerebral Blood Volume
Chromosome Deletion
Chromosomes, Human, 1-3
Contrast Media
Cross-Sectional Studies
DNA Modification Methylases
/ genetics
DNA Repair Enzymes
/ genetics
Gene Expression Profiling
/ methods
Glioblastoma
/ genetics
Glioma
/ blood supply
Humans
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ genetics
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
/ methods
Methylation
Middle Aged
Mutation
Retrospective Studies
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
/ genetics
X-linked Nuclear Protein
/ genetics
Young Adult
Cerebral blood volume
Glioma
Isocitrate dehydrogenase
Neoplasm grading
Perfusion imaging
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
18
09
2017
accepted:
02
02
2018
pubmed:
23
2
2018
medline:
7
2
2020
entrez:
23
2
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (DSC-MRI) for in vivo human glioma molecular profiling. In this study 100 patients with histopathologically confirmed glioma who provided written informed consent were retrospectively assessed between January 2016 and February 2017 in two prospective trials that were approved by the local institutional review board. Cerebral blood volume (CBV) measurements from DSC-MRI were assessed, and histogram parameters of relative CBV (rCBV) results were compared among World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 based histological findings and molecular characteristics. A classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm with 10-fold cross-validation was used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy. The 90th percentile (C90) of rCBV was significantly lower in patients with the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) mutation (2.86 ± 1.21; p < 0.001) and loss of alpha-thalassemia mental retardation syndrome X‑linked (ATRX) expression (2.23 ± 0.91; p < 0.001) than in those with the IDH1/2 wild type (4.78 ± 2.34) and maintained ATRX expression (4.30 ± 2.02). The standard deviation (SD) of rCBV was significantly higher in glioblastoma (GBM) with methylated O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT; 1.99 ± 0.73; p = 0.001) than in those with unmethylated MGMT (1.20 ± 0.45). In CART analysis, rCBV predicted the molecular subgroup in 76.3% of astroglial tumors; however, the diagnostic performance was reduced to 48.1% by including oligodendrogliomas with chromosome 1p/19q co-deletion in the analysis due to substantial overlap of rCBV values between OD The DSC-MRI procedure may provide insight into the IDH1/2 mutation and ATRX expression status and MGMT methylation profile of diffuse glioma; however, taking integrated oligodendroglioma into account limits the diagnostic performance of rCBV in non-invasively predicting the molecular subtype.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29468261
doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0676-2
pii: 10.1007/s00062-018-0676-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
0
IDH2 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.41
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
IDH1 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.42.
DNA Modification Methylases
EC 2.1.1.-
MGMT protein, human
EC 2.1.1.63
ATRX protein, human
EC 3.6.4.12
X-linked Nuclear Protein
EC 3.6.4.12
DNA Repair Enzymes
EC 6.5.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
479-491Subventions
Organisme : Else Übelmesser Foundation
ID : 30.19845
Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Feb;25(2):214-21
pubmed: 14970020
Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Apr;4(4):296-307
pubmed: 15057289
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Feb;26(2):266-73
pubmed: 15709123
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):997-1003
pubmed: 15758010
Oncologist. 2006 Jun;11(6):681-93
pubmed: 16794247
NMR Biomed. 2007 Feb;20(1):49-57
pubmed: 16986106
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Oct;27(9):1969-74
pubmed: 17032877
J Neurosurg. 2007 Sep;107(3):600-9
pubmed: 17886561
Radiology. 2008 Jun;247(3):808-17
pubmed: 18487536
J Neurooncol. 2009 May;92(3):373-86
pubmed: 19357963
Acta Neuropathol. 2009 Oct;118(4):469-74
pubmed: 19554337
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009 Nov;68(11):1219-28
pubmed: 19816195
Brain Pathol. 2010 Jan;20(1):245-54
pubmed: 19903171
Neuro Oncol. 2010 Aug;12(8):822-33
pubmed: 20179017
Neuroradiology. 2011 Jun;53(6):435-47
pubmed: 20857284
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1863-9
pubmed: 21543173
Acta Neuropathol. 2011 Nov;122(5):651-2
pubmed: 21983902
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;29(34):4482-90
pubmed: 22025148
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):701-7
pubmed: 22207304
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Jul;14(7):942-54
pubmed: 22711606
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56328
pubmed: 23451042
PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e63462
pubmed: 23704910
Mod Pathol. 2013 Nov;26(11):1425-32
pubmed: 23765250
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71704
pubmed: 23977117
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;41(2):296-313
pubmed: 24817252
J Neurooncol. 2015 Jan;121(1):141-50
pubmed: 25205290
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Jan;129(1):133-46
pubmed: 25427834
Nat Genet. 2015 May;47(5):458-68
pubmed: 25848751
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Jun;129(6):867-73
pubmed: 25962792
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Sep;130(3):407-17
pubmed: 26087904
Neuroradiology. 2015 Nov;57(11):1111-20
pubmed: 26232204
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 05;5:16238
pubmed: 26538165
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Jun 16;4(1):60
pubmed: 27311324
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb;45(2):492-499
pubmed: 27367599
Radiology. 2017 Jan;282(1):212-221
pubmed: 27428890
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Dec;132(6):917-930
pubmed: 27664011
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Jun;133(6):1001-1016
pubmed: 28255664
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1645-1653
pubmed: 28801186
Radiology. 1994 Apr;191(1):41-51
pubmed: 8134596
Am J Surg Pathol. 1998 Jul;22(7):816-26
pubmed: 9669344
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Dec;171(6):1479-86
pubmed: 9843274