In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components.
Biocompatible Materials
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Ceramics
/ therapeutic use
Dental Cements
/ therapeutic use
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Retention
/ methods
Fibroblasts
Gingiva
/ cytology
Glass Ionomer Cements
/ therapeutic use
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Materials Testing
/ methods
Nanostructures
/ therapeutic use
Titanium
Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
/ therapeutic use
Zinc Phosphate Cement
/ therapeutic use
Bioceramic
biocompatibility
cement-retained crown
dental cement
dental implant
peri-implant disease
resin
resin-modified glass ionomer
titanium
zinc oxide eugenol, zinc phosphate
Journal
Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
accepted:
07
01
2018
pubmed:
10
3
2018
medline:
25
7
2019
entrez:
10
3
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the biocompatibility of five dental cement compositions after directly exposing human gingival fibroblast (HGF) and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells to cement alone and cement applied on commercially pure titanium (cpTi) specimens. Nanostructurally integrated bioceramic (NIB), resin (R), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC), zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE), and zinc phosphate (ZP) compositions were prepared according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. Samples were prepared in cylindrical Teflon molds or applied over the entire surface of polished cpTi discs. All samples were cured for 0.5, 1, 12, or 24 hours post-mixing. Direct contact testing was conducted according to ISO 10993 by seeding 6-well plates at 350,000 cells/well. Plates were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO For samples that cured for 24 hours prior to direct contact exposure, only NIB and ZP cements when cemented on cpTi demonstrated cell viability percentages above the minimum biocompatibility requirement (≥70%) for both the investigative cell lines. R, RMGIC, and ZOE cements exhibited moderate to severe cytotoxic effects on both cell lines in direct contact and when cemented on cpTi specimens. For HGF cells, ZOE cemented-cpTi specimens exhibited significantly decreased cytotoxicity, whereas RMGIC cemented-cpTi specimens exhibited significantly increased cytotoxicity. Despite previous studies that showed enhanced cpTi corrosion activity for fluoride-containing compositions (NIB and ZP), there was no significant difference in cytotoxicity between cement alone and cemented-cpTi. In general, the MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells were more sensitive than HGF cells to cement composition. Ultimately, cement composition played a significant role in maintaining host cell compatibility. Results of this work help illustrate the impact of different cement formulations on host cell health and emphasize the need for understanding material properties when selecting certain formulations of dental cements, which can ultimately influence the survival of dental implant systems.
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Dental Cements
0
Dental Implants
0
Glass Ionomer Cements
0
Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
0
Zinc Phosphate Cement
7779-90-0
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e705-e712Subventions
Organisme : Doxa Dental AB, Axel Johanssons gata 4-6, SE 754 51, Uppsala, Sweden
Informations de copyright
© 2018 by the American College of Prosthodontists.