Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Reduces Opioid Use and Results in Superior Clinical Outcomes When Used Without Opioids.


Journal

Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 01 2019
Historique:
received: 17 08 2017
accepted: 07 02 2018
pubmed: 15 3 2018
medline: 3 1 2020
entrez: 15 3 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Chronic pain causes a significant burden to the US health care system, is difficult to treat, and remains a significant contributor to increased opioid use in the United States. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been FDA approved for the treatment of chronic pain. To evaluate the hypothesis that SCS reduces opioid use, and alone maintains clinical outcome measures of pain and psychosocial determinants of health. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 86 patients undergoing SCS surgery for the treatment of chronic pain between September 2012 and August 2015. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). VAS scores were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-three patients used opioids before SCS implantation. The 33 nonusers had lower mean VAS, NRS, and ODI scores than both opioid groups at 1 yr and improved significantly at 1 yr on the VAS (P < .001), NRS (P < .001), MPQ (P = .002), PCS (P < .001), BDI (P = .04), and ODI (P = .002). After surgery, 41.5% remained opioids and 58.5% reduced/eliminated use. Discontinued (n = 29) or reduced (n = 2) use resulted in VAS, NRS, total MPQ, and ODI score reduction (P < .001, P = .002, P = .002, and P = .009 respectively). At 1 yr, survey scores in opioid users were unchanged. There was no difference between groups in revision or failure rates. Sixty-four percent of patients who were using opioids prior to SCS reduced (n = 2) or eliminated opioid use (n = 29) at 1 yr postoperatively. Patients who eliminated opioid use or never used opioids had superior clinical outcomes to those who continued use.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Chronic pain causes a significant burden to the US health care system, is difficult to treat, and remains a significant contributor to increased opioid use in the United States. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been FDA approved for the treatment of chronic pain.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the hypothesis that SCS reduces opioid use, and alone maintains clinical outcome measures of pain and psychosocial determinants of health.
METHODS
In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 86 patients undergoing SCS surgery for the treatment of chronic pain between September 2012 and August 2015. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). VAS scores were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS
Fifty-three patients used opioids before SCS implantation. The 33 nonusers had lower mean VAS, NRS, and ODI scores than both opioid groups at 1 yr and improved significantly at 1 yr on the VAS (P < .001), NRS (P < .001), MPQ (P = .002), PCS (P < .001), BDI (P = .04), and ODI (P = .002). After surgery, 41.5% remained opioids and 58.5% reduced/eliminated use. Discontinued (n = 29) or reduced (n = 2) use resulted in VAS, NRS, total MPQ, and ODI score reduction (P < .001, P = .002, P = .002, and P = .009 respectively). At 1 yr, survey scores in opioid users were unchanged. There was no difference between groups in revision or failure rates.
CONCLUSION
Sixty-four percent of patients who were using opioids prior to SCS reduced (n = 2) or eliminated opioid use (n = 29) at 1 yr postoperatively. Patients who eliminated opioid use or never used opioids had superior clinical outcomes to those who continued use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29538696
pii: 4929817
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy065
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

217-226

Auteurs

Lucy Gee (L)

Albany Medical Center Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany, New York.

Heather C Smith (HC)

Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.

Zohal Ghulam-Jelani (Z)

Albany Medical Center Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.

Hirah Khan (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.

Julia Prusik (J)

Albany Medical Center Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.

Paul J Feustel (PJ)

Albany Medical Center Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany, New York.

Sarah E McCallum (SE)

Albany Medical Center Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany, New York.

Julie G Pilitsis (JG)

Albany Medical Center Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH