Taking the Test Taker's Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments.
Likert scale
item format
multidimensional forced-choice
rating scale
response format
response process
test motivation
Journal
Assessment
ISSN: 1552-3489
Titre abrégé: Assessment
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
22
3
2018
medline:
1
7
2021
entrez:
22
3
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has been proposed as an alternative to the rating scale (RS) response format. However, it is unclear how changing the response format may affect the response process and test motivation of participants. In Study 1, we investigated the MFC response process using the think-aloud technique. In Study 2, we compared test motivation between the RS format and different versions of the MFC format (presenting 2, 3, 4, and 5 items simultaneously). The response process to MFC item blocks was similar to the RS response process but involved an additional step of weighing the items within a block against each other. The RS and MFC response format groups did not differ in their test motivation. Thus, from the test taker's perspective, the MFC format is somewhat more demanding to respond to, but this does not appear to decrease test motivation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29560735
doi: 10.1177/1073191118762049
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM