Chronic Essex-Lopresti injury: a systematic review of current treatment options.
Interosseous membrane injury
Longitudinal forearm instability
Radial head fractures
TFCC injury
Journal
International orthopaedics
ISSN: 1432-5195
Titre abrégé: Int Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7705431
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
23
10
2017
accepted:
12
03
2018
pubmed:
25
3
2018
medline:
1
2
2020
entrez:
25
3
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Essex-Lopresti lesion (ELL) is a severe injury. Most of ELL is recognized in chronic phase representing a therapeutic challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight and criticize current concepts in the surgical treatment. The search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A comprehensive research of Pubmed database was made using the following Mesh term: ((Essex-Lopresti injury) OR (Essex Lopresti) OR (distal radio ulnar dissociation) OR (distal radio ulnar dislocation) OR (longitudinal forearm instability)). Quality assessment of each article was performed according to Coleman score by two authors. Eight full articles were included to the systematic review. Surgical treatment was differentiated in five categories according to the most common procedure reported in clinical series. The mean Coleman Score was 51.13 ± 9.76. Case series reported in the literature include a limited number of patients with chronic ELL. Currently, salvage procedure devoted to treat a wrong diagnosis and an incorrect treatment is used. Radial head replacement together with ulnar shortening osteotomy and interosseous membrane reconstruction are the most common treatments of choice, but at present, there is not yet a shared scheme of management for patients with chronic ELL. According to current literature, a case-by-case treatment must always be considered. Further investigations, with higher level of evidence, quality of study design, and number of patients, are needed to better assess clinical results and complication of each technique. IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29572641
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3888-9
pii: 10.1007/s00264-018-3888-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1413-1420Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Oct;93(10):1389-94
pubmed: 21969440
Br J Surg. 1946 Jul;34:74-7
pubmed: 20994136
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2004 Mar-Apr;142(2):235-40
pubmed: 15106070
J Wrist Surg. 2016 Aug;5(3):172-8
pubmed: 27468366
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jun;23(6):861-6
pubmed: 24766790
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Sep;25(9):1491-500
pubmed: 27374233
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951 May;33B(2):244-7
pubmed: 14832324
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):457-61
pubmed: 19204521
Hand Clin. 2007 May;23(2):195-208, vi
pubmed: 17548011
J Wrist Surg. 2016 Aug;5(3):184-7
pubmed: 27468368
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2016 Mar;20(1):6-13
pubmed: 26599202
Hand (N Y). 2014 Mar;9(1):87-92
pubmed: 24570643
Hand Clin. 2002 Feb;18(1):195-204
pubmed: 12143415
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1828-33
pubmed: 16085626
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000 Feb;10(1):2-11
pubmed: 10693606
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Dec;74(10):1486-97
pubmed: 1469008
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):1043-1050
pubmed: 28632594
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Sep;19(6):929-36
pubmed: 20713279
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012 Dec;16(4):187-93
pubmed: 23160548
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Jan;33(1):124-30
pubmed: 18261676
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Sep;(234):61-9
pubmed: 3409602
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Dec;88(12):1629-33
pubmed: 17159177
J Wrist Surg. 2017 May;6(2):97-101
pubmed: 28428910
Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 Jun;28(3):300-7
pubmed: 16474924
J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Mar;22(2):269-78
pubmed: 9195426
Chir Main. 2007 Dec;26(6):255-77
pubmed: 18023237
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2014 Mar;18(1):51-5
pubmed: 24487282
J South Orthop Assoc. 1999 Spring;8(1):47-52
pubmed: 12132853