Comparison of Ketamine- Versus Nonketamine-Based Sedation on Delirium and Coma in the Intensive Care Unit.
Academic Medical Centers
Aged
Coma
/ chemically induced
Critical Care Outcomes
Delirium
/ chemically induced
Dexmedetomidine
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
/ adverse effects
Intensive Care Units
Ketamine
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Propofol
/ adverse effects
Respiration, Artificial
/ psychology
Retrospective Studies
United States
analgesia
critical care
hypnotics and sedatives
intensive care
ketamine
propofol
Journal
Journal of intensive care medicine
ISSN: 1525-1489
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610344
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
4
2018
medline:
20
2
2021
entrez:
3
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
At this time, there are no studies evaluating the risk of delirium or coma with the use of ketamine in mechanically ventilated adult patients, compared to conventional therapies such as propofol or dexmedetomidine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the number of days alive without delirium or coma in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit receiving analgosedation infusions with ketamine versus without ketamine. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center in the United States. Consecutive mechanically ventilated adult patients between November 2015 and April 2017 were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the sedative regimen used: ketamine based or nonketamine based. The primary outcome was the number of days alive without delirium or coma. The secondary outcomes were incidence of delirium, incidence of coma, and ventilator-free days at day 28. The study cohort consisted of 79 patients, of which 39 received ketamine- and 40 received nonketamine-based sedation. The number of days alive without delirium or coma was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-9 days) with ketamine and 4 days (IQR: 3-7 days) with nonketamine ( Sustained ketamine-based sedation in mechanically ventilated patients may be associated with a higher rate of observed coma but similar delirium- and coma-free days compared nonketamine-based regimens.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
At this time, there are no studies evaluating the risk of delirium or coma with the use of ketamine in mechanically ventilated adult patients, compared to conventional therapies such as propofol or dexmedetomidine.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate the number of days alive without delirium or coma in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit receiving analgosedation infusions with ketamine versus without ketamine.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center in the United States. Consecutive mechanically ventilated adult patients between November 2015 and April 2017 were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the sedative regimen used: ketamine based or nonketamine based. The primary outcome was the number of days alive without delirium or coma. The secondary outcomes were incidence of delirium, incidence of coma, and ventilator-free days at day 28.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study cohort consisted of 79 patients, of which 39 received ketamine- and 40 received nonketamine-based sedation. The number of days alive without delirium or coma was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-9 days) with ketamine and 4 days (IQR: 3-7 days) with nonketamine (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Sustained ketamine-based sedation in mechanically ventilated patients may be associated with a higher rate of observed coma but similar delirium- and coma-free days compared nonketamine-based regimens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29607710
doi: 10.1177/0885066618767619
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Dexmedetomidine
67VB76HONO
Ketamine
690G0D6V8H
Propofol
YI7VU623SF
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM