Long-term retention rates of adalimumab and infliximab in non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis.
Adalimumab
Biologic therapy
Drug retention rate
Infliximab
Uveitis
Journal
Clinical rheumatology
ISSN: 1434-9949
Titre abrégé: Clin Rheumatol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8211469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
21
02
2018
accepted:
11
03
2018
pubmed:
4
4
2018
medline:
14
5
2019
entrez:
4
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the present study was to compare long-term adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) retention rates in patients with intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. Additional aims are as follows: (i) to identify any difference in the causes of treatment discontinuation between patients treated with ADA and IFX; (ii) to assess any impact of demographic features, concomitant treatments, and different lines of biologic therapy on ADA and IFX retention rates; and (iii) to identify any correlation between ADA and IFX treatment duration and the age at uveitis onset, the age at onset of the associated systemic diseases, and the age at the start of treatment. Clinical, therapeutic, and demographic data from patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis treated with ADA or IFX were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to assess survival curves. One hundred eight patients (188 eyes) were enrolled; in 87 (80.6%) patients, uveitis was associated with a systemic disease. ADA and IFX were administered in 62 and 46 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates (p value = 0.22). Similarly, no differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates in relation to gender (p value = 0.61 for males, p value = 0.09 for females), monotherapy (p value = 0.08), combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (log-rank p value = 0.63), and different lines of biologic therapy (p value = 0.79 for biologic-naïve patients; p value = 0.81 for subjects previously treated with other biologics). In conclusion, ADA and IFX have similar long-term retention rates in patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic features do not affect their long-term effectiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29611087
doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4069-3
pii: 10.1007/s10067-018-4069-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
0
Infliximab
B72HH48FLU
Adalimumab
FYS6T7F842
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
63-70Références
Ophthalmology. 2004 Mar;111(3):491-500; discussion 500
pubmed: 15019324
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;140(3):509-16
pubmed: 16196117
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 May;68(5):696-701
pubmed: 18662932
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Mar;50(3):593-7
pubmed: 21097877
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 May;250(5):713-20
pubmed: 22119879
Hum Immunol. 2013 Oct;74(10):1363-7
pubmed: 23831258
Trials. 2014 Jan 09;15:14
pubmed: 24405833
Surv Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov-Dec;60(6):575-89
pubmed: 26164735
Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;20(1):103-108
pubmed: 26284332
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:1-8
pubmed: 27296486
Lancet. 2016 Sep 17;388(10050):1183-92
pubmed: 27542302
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):932-43
pubmed: 27602665
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Nov;35(11):2631-2638
pubmed: 27686662
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017 Feb;25(1):46-51
pubmed: 27767359
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;36(1):183-189
pubmed: 27853889
Isr Med Assoc J. 2017 Aug;19(8):478-483
pubmed: 28825765
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;102(5):637-641
pubmed: 28844047
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017 Nov 3;:1-6
pubmed: 29099660
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Nov-Dec;35 Suppl 108(6):86-89
pubmed: 29148418
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jul;77(7):1003-1011
pubmed: 29275333
Ophthalmology. 1995 Feb;102(2):317-21
pubmed: 7862420
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr;80(4):332-6
pubmed: 8703885