Procedures for central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren.
Auditory perception
Audição
Child
Criança
Estudantes
Hearing
Hearing tests
Percepção auditiva
Schoolchildren
Testes auditivos
Journal
Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
ISSN: 1808-8686
Titre abrégé: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101207337
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
15
01
2018
revised:
17
02
2018
accepted:
19
02
2018
pubmed:
5
4
2018
medline:
10
7
2019
entrez:
5
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Central auditory processing screening in schoolchildren has led to debates in literature, both regarding the protocol to be used and the importance of actions aimed at prevention and promotion of auditory health. Defining effective screening procedures for central auditory processing is a challenge in Audiology. This study aimed to analyze the scientific research on central auditory processing screening and discuss the effectiveness of the procedures utilized. A search was performed in the SciELO and PUBMed databases by two researchers. The descriptors used in Portuguese and English were: auditory processing, screening, hearing, auditory perception, children, auditory tests and their respective terms in Portuguese. original articles involving schoolchildren, auditory screening of central auditory skills and articles in Portuguese or English. studies with adult and/or neonatal populations, peripheral auditory screening only, and duplicate articles. After applying the described criteria, 11 articles were included. At the international level, central auditory processing screening methods used were: screening test for auditory processing disorder and its revised version, screening test for auditory processing, scale of auditory behaviors, children's auditory performance scale and Feather Squadron. In the Brazilian scenario, the procedures used were the simplified auditory processing assessment and Zaidan's battery of tests. At the international level, the screening test for auditory processing and Feather Squadron batteries stand out as the most comprehensive evaluation of hearing skills. At the national level, there is a paucity of studies that use methods evaluating more than four skills, and are normalized by age group. The use of simplified auditory processing assessment and questionnaires can be complementary in the search for an easy access and low-cost alternative in the auditory screening of Brazilian schoolchildren. Interactive tools should be proposed, that allow the selection of as many hearing skills as possible, validated by comparison with the battery of tests used in the diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29615299
pii: S1808-8694(18)30067-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.02.004
pmc: PMC9442811
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
319-328Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Références
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Aug;99:66-72
pubmed: 28688568
J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Oct;21(7):367-76
pubmed: 26026181
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May;84:166-73
pubmed: 27063775
Pro Fono. 2007 Oct-Dec;19(4):370-3
pubmed: 18200386
J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Sep;11(8):438-45
pubmed: 11012239
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Aug;41(4):834-45
pubmed: 9712130
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Oct;32(8):1407-13
pubmed: 20950282
Codas. 2013;25(1):39-44
pubmed: 24408169
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jul;68(7):954-9
pubmed: 23917659
Codas. 2013;25(3):209-15
pubmed: 24408330
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2000;543:73-6
pubmed: 10908983
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar - Apr;83(2):137-141
pubmed: 27236631
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Oct;24(9):867-78
pubmed: 24224993
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):295-305
pubmed: 24496289
Int J Audiol. 2016;55(3):173-83
pubmed: 26329098
Pediatrics. 2010 Aug;126(2):e382-90
pubmed: 20660546
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):278-91
pubmed: 20689023
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Jul 12;22:2424-30
pubmed: 27402315