Quantification of Subdural Electrode Shift Between Initial Implantation, Postimplantation Computed Tomography, and Subsequent Resection Surgery.
Journal
Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 2332-4260
Titre abrégé: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635417
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2019
01 01 2019
Historique:
received:
10
08
2017
accepted:
25
02
2018
pubmed:
5
4
2018
medline:
28
4
2020
entrez:
5
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Subdural electrodes are often implanted for localization of epileptic regions. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) is typically acquired to locate electrode positions for planning any subsequent surgical resection. Electrodes are assumed to remain stationary between CT acquisition and resection surgery. To quantify subdural electrode shift that occurred between the times of implantation (Crani 1), postoperative CT acquisition, and resection surgery (Crani 2). Twenty-three patients in this case series undergoing subdural electrode implantation were evaluated. Preoperative magnetic resonance and postoperative CT were acquired and coregistered, and electrode positions were extracted from CT. Intraoperative positions of electrodes and the cortical surface were digitized with a coregistered stereovision system. Movement of the exposed cortical surface was also tracked, and change in electrode positions was calculated relative to both the skull and the cortical surface. In the 23 cases, average shift of electrode positions was 8.0 ± 3.3 mm between Crani 1 and CT, 9.2 ± 3.7 mm between CT and Crani 2, and 6.2 ± 3.0 mm between Crani 1 and Crani 2. The average cortical shift was 4.7 ± 1.4 mm with 2.9 ± 1.0 mm in the lateral direction. The average shift of electrode positions relative to the cortical surface between Crani 1 and Crani 2 was 5.5 ± 3.7 mm. The results show that electrodes shifted laterally not only relative to the skull, but also relative to the cortical surface, thereby displacing the electrodes from their initial placement on the cortex. This has significant clinical implications for resection based upon seizure activity and functional mapping derived from intracranial electrodes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Subdural electrodes are often implanted for localization of epileptic regions. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) is typically acquired to locate electrode positions for planning any subsequent surgical resection. Electrodes are assumed to remain stationary between CT acquisition and resection surgery.
OBJECTIVE
To quantify subdural electrode shift that occurred between the times of implantation (Crani 1), postoperative CT acquisition, and resection surgery (Crani 2).
METHODS
Twenty-three patients in this case series undergoing subdural electrode implantation were evaluated. Preoperative magnetic resonance and postoperative CT were acquired and coregistered, and electrode positions were extracted from CT. Intraoperative positions of electrodes and the cortical surface were digitized with a coregistered stereovision system. Movement of the exposed cortical surface was also tracked, and change in electrode positions was calculated relative to both the skull and the cortical surface.
RESULTS
In the 23 cases, average shift of electrode positions was 8.0 ± 3.3 mm between Crani 1 and CT, 9.2 ± 3.7 mm between CT and Crani 2, and 6.2 ± 3.0 mm between Crani 1 and Crani 2. The average cortical shift was 4.7 ± 1.4 mm with 2.9 ± 1.0 mm in the lateral direction. The average shift of electrode positions relative to the cortical surface between Crani 1 and Crani 2 was 5.5 ± 3.7 mm.
CONCLUSION
The results show that electrodes shifted laterally not only relative to the skull, but also relative to the cortical surface, thereby displacing the electrodes from their initial placement on the cortex. This has significant clinical implications for resection based upon seizure activity and functional mapping derived from intracranial electrodes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29617890
pii: 4956234
doi: 10.1093/ons/opy050
pmc: PMC7189204
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9-19Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA159324
Pays : United States
Références
Neurosurgery. 2011 Mar;68(1 Suppl Operative):152-60; discussion 160-1
pubmed: 21206319
J Neurosurg. 1984 Jun;60(6):1195-200
pubmed: 6726363
Epilepsy Res. 2000 Sep;41(2):169-78
pubmed: 10940618
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 May;26(5):1078-83
pubmed: 15891163
Neurosurgery. 2007 Nov;61(5 Suppl 2):340-4; discussion 344-5
pubmed: 18091249
Neurosurg Focus. 2008 Sep;25(3):E21
pubmed: 18759623
Med Image Anal. 2014 Oct;18(7):1169-83
pubmed: 25077845
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;128(1-4):84-7
pubmed: 7847148
Neurology. 1990 Jan;40(1):74-9
pubmed: 2296386
J Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;113(6):1182-5
pubmed: 20113163
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Jan;9(1):91-105
pubmed: 23793723
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Mar;23(3):400-3
pubmed: 11901007
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009 Nov;4(6):609-16
pubmed: 20033337
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 1):440-7
pubmed: 25333148
Neurosurgery. 2006 Jan;58(1):120-5; discussion 120-5
pubmed: 16385336
Epilepsy Res. 2011 Mar;94(1-2):102-9
pubmed: 21334178