Incidence and Time of Onset of Osseous Pseudoprogression in Patients With Metastatic Spine Disease From Renal Cell or Prostate Carcinoma After Treatment With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.


Journal

Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 03 2019
Historique:
received: 24 10 2017
accepted: 14 02 2018
pubmed: 5 4 2018
medline: 2 1 2020
entrez: 5 4 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tumor osseous pseudoprogression (PP), defined as an imaging-based transient increase in tumor size following treatment, was recently described in patients with spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiation therapy. Distinguishing PP from true tumor progression is critical. To describe the incidence, time of onset, and time range of PP following stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients treated for spinal metastases from either prostate cancer (PC) or renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and associated predictive factors. A retrospective study was conducted on our institution's cancer database from 2009 to 2015. Selection was based on single level, no prior radiation or surgery, ≥2 follow-up spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and metastases arising from either PC or RCC. Gross tumor volume was contoured on pre- and up to 5 posttreatment MRIs. Patients were sorted into groups depending on gross tumor volume response: PP, non-PP, or progressive disease. Clinical and dosimetric variables were compared using either Fisher's exact test or Kruskal-Wallis analyses. Forty-three spinal segments from 31 patients were analyzed. RCC and PC patients showed similar incidence of PP (∼37%). Whether the primary was lytic or sclerotic was a significant predictive factor with more PP in the lytic group (P = .0208). There was a trend of earlier PP onset in RCC (within 6-18 mo) as compared to PC; however, PC segments showed more time-confined presentation of PP (9-12 mo). There was a higher incidence of PP in lytic compared to sclerotic primary tumor type. PP in spinal metastatic sites may have variable presentations depending on the primary cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Tumor osseous pseudoprogression (PP), defined as an imaging-based transient increase in tumor size following treatment, was recently described in patients with spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiation therapy. Distinguishing PP from true tumor progression is critical.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the incidence, time of onset, and time range of PP following stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients treated for spinal metastases from either prostate cancer (PC) or renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and associated predictive factors.
METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted on our institution's cancer database from 2009 to 2015. Selection was based on single level, no prior radiation or surgery, ≥2 follow-up spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and metastases arising from either PC or RCC. Gross tumor volume was contoured on pre- and up to 5 posttreatment MRIs. Patients were sorted into groups depending on gross tumor volume response: PP, non-PP, or progressive disease. Clinical and dosimetric variables were compared using either Fisher's exact test or Kruskal-Wallis analyses.
RESULTS
Forty-three spinal segments from 31 patients were analyzed. RCC and PC patients showed similar incidence of PP (∼37%). Whether the primary was lytic or sclerotic was a significant predictive factor with more PP in the lytic group (P = .0208). There was a trend of earlier PP onset in RCC (within 6-18 mo) as compared to PC; however, PC segments showed more time-confined presentation of PP (9-12 mo).
CONCLUSION
There was a higher incidence of PP in lytic compared to sclerotic primary tumor type. PP in spinal metastatic sites may have variable presentations depending on the primary cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29618107
pii: 4956636
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy075
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

647-654

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Auteurs

Pejman Jabehdar Maralani (P)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Kathleen Winger (K)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Sean Symons (S)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Matylda Machnowska (M)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Chinthaka Heyn (C)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Ali Helmi (A)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Aimee Chan (A)

Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Chia-Lin Tseng (CL)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Arjun Sahgal (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH