Organ and tissue donation from poisoned patients in the emergency department: A Canadian emergency physician survey.
Canada
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Physicians
/ statistics & numerical data
Poisoning
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tissue Donors
/ supply & distribution
Tissue and Organ Procurement
/ organization & administration
Waiting Lists
organ donation
poison
tissue donation
toxicology
Journal
CJEM
ISSN: 1481-8043
Titre abrégé: CJEM
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100893237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
11
4
2018
medline:
1
4
2020
entrez:
11
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Screening for organ and tissue donation is an essential skill for emergency physicians. In 2015, 4,631 Canadians were on a waiting list for a transplant, and 262 died while waiting. Canada’s donation rates are less than half of comparable countries, so it is essential to explore strategies to improve the referral of donors. Poisoned patients may be one such underutilized source for donation. This study explores physician practices and perceptions regarding the referral of poisoned patients as donors. In this cross-sectional unidirectional survey, 1,471 physician members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians were invited to participate. Physicians were presented with 20 scenarios and asked whether they would refer the patient as a potential organ or tissue donor. Results were reported descriptively, and associations between demographics and referral patterns were assessed. Physicians totalling 208 participated in the organ or tissue donation scenarios (14.1%); 75% of scenarios involving poisoning were referred for organ or tissue donation, compared with 92% in a non-poisoning scenario. Poisons associated with lower referrals included sedatives, acetaminophen, chemical exposure, and organophosphates. A total of 175 physicians completed the demographic survey (11.9%). Characteristics associated with increased referrals included previous referral experience, donation training, donation support, >10 years of service, urban practice, emergency medicine certification, and male gender. Scenarios involving poisoning were referred less often when compared with an ideal scenario. Because poisoning is not a contraindication for referral, this represents a potential source of donors. Targeted training and referral support may help improve donation rates in this demographic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29631642
pii: S148180351800043X
doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.43
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
47-54Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn