Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy: a review of the national inpatient sample.
Adrenalectomy
Endocrine surgery
Laparoscopic surgery
National inpatient sample
Robotic surgery
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
26
01
2018
accepted:
16
04
2018
pubmed:
27
4
2018
medline:
20
6
2019
entrez:
27
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard treatment of adrenal lesions. Recently, robotic-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) has become an option, however, short-term outcomes for RA have not been well studied and benefits over LA are debatable. The aim of this study was to explore differences in short-term outcomes between LA and RA using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database. Patient data were collected from the NIS. All patients undergoing LA or RA from January 2009 to December 2012 were included. Univariate analysis and propensity matching were performed to look for differences between the groups. A total of 1006 patients (66.4% in LA group and 33.6% in RA group) were identified. Patient age group, gender, race, risk of mortality, severity of illness or indication for adrenalectomy did not differ significantly between the LA or RA cohorts. Insurance type predicted procedure type (45% of medicare patients underwent RA versus 29% of patients with private insurance, p < 0.0001). Patients living in the highest income areas were more likely to receive the laparoscopic approach (31.7 versus 17.4%, p < 0.0001). Hospital volume, bed size and teaching status of the hospital were not significant factors in the decision of RA versus LA. There was no difference in complication and conversion rates between RA versus LA. The mean length of stay was shorter in the RA group (2.2 versus 1.9 days, p = 0.03). Total charges were higher in the RA group ($42,659 versus $33,748, p < 0.0001). There was a significant trend towards more adrenalectomies being performed robotic assisted by year. Only 22% of adrenalectomies were performed robotic-assisted in 2009 compared with 48% in 2012. The overall benefit for RA remains small and higher total charges for RA may currently outweigh the benefits. These findings may change as more cases are performed robotically assisted and robotic technology improves.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard treatment of adrenal lesions. Recently, robotic-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) has become an option, however, short-term outcomes for RA have not been well studied and benefits over LA are debatable. The aim of this study was to explore differences in short-term outcomes between LA and RA using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database.
METHODS
METHODS
Patient data were collected from the NIS. All patients undergoing LA or RA from January 2009 to December 2012 were included. Univariate analysis and propensity matching were performed to look for differences between the groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1006 patients (66.4% in LA group and 33.6% in RA group) were identified. Patient age group, gender, race, risk of mortality, severity of illness or indication for adrenalectomy did not differ significantly between the LA or RA cohorts. Insurance type predicted procedure type (45% of medicare patients underwent RA versus 29% of patients with private insurance, p < 0.0001). Patients living in the highest income areas were more likely to receive the laparoscopic approach (31.7 versus 17.4%, p < 0.0001). Hospital volume, bed size and teaching status of the hospital were not significant factors in the decision of RA versus LA. There was no difference in complication and conversion rates between RA versus LA. The mean length of stay was shorter in the RA group (2.2 versus 1.9 days, p = 0.03). Total charges were higher in the RA group ($42,659 versus $33,748, p < 0.0001). There was a significant trend towards more adrenalectomies being performed robotic assisted by year. Only 22% of adrenalectomies were performed robotic-assisted in 2009 compared with 48% in 2012.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The overall benefit for RA remains small and higher total charges for RA may currently outweigh the benefits. These findings may change as more cases are performed robotically assisted and robotic technology improves.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29696591
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0808-3
pii: 10.1007/s11701-018-0808-3
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
69-75Références
Wu JC, Wu H, Lin M, Chou D, Huang M (2008) Comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy with traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy—1 year follow-up. Surg Endosc 22:463–466
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9488-1
pubmed: 17704877
Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E (1992) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 327:1033
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210013271417
pubmed: 1387700
Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, Bocciardi A, Da Pozzo L, Rigatti P, Lanzi R, Pontiroli A (1995) Transperitoneal laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for benign hyperfunctioning adrenal tumors: a comparative study. J Urol 153:1597–1600
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67471-8
pubmed: 7714980
Piazza L, Caragliano P, Scardilli M, Sgroi AV, Marino G, Giannone G (1999) Laparoscopic robot-assisted right adrenalectomy and left ovariectomy (case reports). Chir Ital 51:465–466
pubmed: 10742897
Hubens G, Ysebaert D, Vaneerdeweg W, Chapelle T, Eyskens E (1999) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy with the aid of the AESOP 2000 robot. Acta Chir Belg 99:125–127
pubmed: 10427347
Gill IS, Sung GT, Hsu TH, Meraney AM (2000) Robotic remote laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: the initial experience. J Urol 164:2082–2085
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66973-X
pubmed: 11061931
Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11:415–419
doi: 10.1089/10926420152761950
pubmed: 11814134
Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS, Academic Robotics Group (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17:1521–1524
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8853-3
pubmed: 12915974
NIS Description of Data Elements (2018) https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_bedsize/nisnote.jsp . Accessed 28 Mar 2018
Morris LF, Perrier ND, (2012) Advances in robotic adrenalectomy. Curr Opin Oncol 24:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834da8e1
doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834da8e1
pubmed: 22080946
Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A, Rockall T (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18:372–378
doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9047-3
pubmed: 14752634
Shiozawa M, Sata N, Endo K, Koizumi M, Yasuda Y, Nagai H, Takakusaki H (2009) Preoperative virtual simulation of adrenal tumors. Abdom Imaging 34:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9364-z
doi: 10.1007/s00261-008-9364-z
pubmed: 18253779
Duchene DA, Moinzadeh A, Gill IS, Clayman RV, Winfield HN (2006) Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. J Urol 176:2158–2166
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.035
pubmed: 17070283
Chai YJ, Kwon H, Yu HW, Kim S, Choi JY, Lee KE, Youn Y (2014) systematic review of surgical approaches for adrenal tumors: lateral transperitoneal versus posterior retroperitoneal and laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy. Int J Endocrinol 2014:918346. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/918346
doi: 10.1155/2014/918346
pubmed: 25587275
pmcid: 4281398
Manny TB, Pompeo AS, Hemal AK (2013) Robotic partial adrenalectomy using indocyanine green dye with near-infrared imaging: the initial clinical experience. Urology 82:738–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.074
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.074
pubmed: 23859531
Bruschi M, Micali S, Porpiglia F, Celia A, De Stefani S, Grande M, Scarpa RM, Bianchi G (2005) Laparoscopic telementored adrenalectomy: the Italian experience. Surg Endosc 19:836–840
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9124-2
pubmed: 15880286
Treter S, Perrier N, Sosa JA, Roman S (2013) Telementoring: a multi-institutional experience with the introduction of a novel surgical approach for adrenalectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2754–2758. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2894-9
doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2894-9
pubmed: 23512076
Park JH, Walz MK, Kang S, Jeong J, Nam K, Chang H, Chung W, Park C (2011) Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: single port access. J Korean Surg Soc 81:S21–S24. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.81.Suppl1.S21
doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.Suppl1.S21
pubmed: 22319732
pmcid: 3267059
Park JH, Kim SY, Lee C, Park S, Jeong JS, Kang S, Jeong JJ, Nam K, Chung WY, Park CS (2013) Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2741–2745. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z
doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z
pubmed: 23494081
Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic vs laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg 147:272–275. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.2040
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2040
pubmed: 22430911
Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19:117–119
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9
pubmed: 15549629
Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Raphoz A, Levan T, Weryha G, Boissel P (2008) Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg 195:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.016
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.016
pubmed: 18304514
Winter JM, Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Hundt JD, Dackiw AP, Campbell KA, Schulick RD (2006) Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience. Surg Endosc 20:119–124
doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0082-0
pubmed: 16333534
Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Rouers A, Klein M, Boissel P, Bresler L (2008) Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery 144:995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.08.032
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.08.032
pubmed: 19041009
Nordenstrom E, Westerdahl J, Hallgrimsson P, Bergenfelz A (2011) A prospective study of 100 roboticallyassisted laparoscopic adrenalectomies. J robot surg 5:127–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0243-1
doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0243-1
pubmed: 27637539
Brunaud L, Germain A, Zarnegar R, Cuny T, Ayav A, Bresler L (2011) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182270b0a
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182270b0a
pubmed: 21857473
Aksoy E, Taskin HE, Aliyev S, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy in obese patients. Surg Endosc 27:1233–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2580-1
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2580-1
pubmed: 23073684
Ariyan C, Strong VE (2007) The current status of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Adv Surg 41:133–153
doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2007.05.008
pubmed: 17972561
Gumbs AA, Gagner M (2006) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 20:483–499
doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2006.07.010
Hyams ES, Stifelman MD (2009) The role of robotics for adrenal pathology. Curr Opin Urol 19:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831b446c
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831b446c
pubmed: 19057223
Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, Tretou S, Cormier L, Klein M, Boissel P (2003) Advantages of using robotic Da Vinci system for unilateral adrenalectomy: early results. Ann Chir 128:530–535
doi: 10.1016/S0003-3944(03)00220-7
pubmed: 14559304
Morino M, Beninca G, Giraudo G, Del Genio GM, Rebecchi F, Garrone C (2004) Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 18:1742–1746
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9046-z
pubmed: 15809781
Brandao LF, Jihad H, Autorino R, Laydner H, Haber G-P, Ouzaid I, De Sio M, Perdona S, Stein RJ, Porpiglia F, Kaouk JH (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 65:1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.021
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.021
pubmed: 24079955
Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2288–2294. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2296-4
doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2296-4
pubmed: 22396002
Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.047
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.047
pubmed: 22142558
Pineda-Solis K, Medina-Franco H, Heslin MJ (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a comparative study in a high-volume center. Surg Endosc 27:599–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2496-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2496-9
pubmed: 22955998