Dosimetric effects of bolus and lens shielding in treating ocular lymphomas with low-energy electrons.


Journal

Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists
ISSN: 1873-4022
Titre abrégé: Med Dosim
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8908862

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 02 11 2017
revised: 12 01 2018
accepted: 25 01 2018
pubmed: 28 4 2018
medline: 30 5 2019
entrez: 28 4 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Radiation therapy is an effective treatment for primary orbital lymphomas. Lens shielding with electrons can reduce the risk of high-grade cataracts in patients undergoing treatment for superficial tumors. This work evaluates the dosimetric effects of a suspended eye shield, placement of bolus, and varying electron energies. Film (GafChromic EBT3) dosimetry and relative output factors were measured for 6, 8, and 10 MeV electron energies. A customized 5-cm diameter circle electron orbital cutout was constructed for a 6 × 6-cm applicator with a suspended lens shield (8-mm diameter Cerrobend cylinder, 2.2-cm length). Point doses were measured using a scanning electron diode in a solid water phantom at depths representative of the anterior and posterior lens. Depth dose profiles were compared for 0-mm, 3-mm, and 5-mm bolus thicknesses. At 5 mm (the approximate distance of the anterior lens from the surface of the cornea), the percent depth dose under the suspended lens shield was reduced to 15%, 15%, and 14% for electron energies 6, 8, and 10 MeV, respectively. Applying bolus reduced the benefit of lens shielding by increasing the estimated doses under the block to 27% for 3-mm and 44% for 5-mm bolus for a 6 MeV incident electron beam. This effect is minimized with 8 MeV electron beams where the corresponding values were 15.5% and 18% for 3-mm and 5-mm bolus. Introduction of a 7-mm hole in 5-mm bolus to stabilize eye motion during treatment altered lens doses by about 1%. Careful selection of electron energy and consideration of bolus effects are needed to account for electron scatter under a lens shield.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29699800
pii: S0958-3947(18)30018-9
doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.01.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

35-42

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lori Young (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. Electronic address: layoung@uw.edu.

Landon S Wootton (LS)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Alan M Kalet (AM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Olga Gopan (O)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; Northwest Medical Physics Group, Lynnwood, WA 33136.

Fei Yang (F)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136.

Samuel Day (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Michael Banitt (M)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Jay J Liao (JJ)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH