Short- and Long-Term Effects of Late Maxillary Advancement With the Liou-Alt-RAMEC Protocol in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
cephalometry
facial growth
maxilla
midfacial growth
nonsyndromic clefting
orthodontics
orthopedic treatment
osteogenesis
skeletal morphology
Journal
The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
ISSN: 1545-1569
Titre abrégé: Cleft Palate Craniofac J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9102566
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
4
2018
medline:
31
12
2019
entrez:
28
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this retrospective longitudinal study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of the application of the Liou Alt-RAMEC (alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction) technique, a late orthopedic maxillary protraction technique, with intraoral anchorage, in patients with cleft. Twenty-six patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) were consecutively treated with the Alt-RAMEC technique. The average age of the patients was 11.7 years (10.3-13.2 years) before protraction and 18.3 years (17.4-21.1 years) at long-term follow-up. A sample of nontreated patients with UCLP was used as a control group. It was matched for sex, skeletal class III, and age (11.3 years). The control sample had records at the end of growth (18.7 years). The sagittal advancement of A-point, after the application of the technique, was 5.7 (2.17) mm. Some mandibular dentoalveolar and positional adaptation was noted. The position of the maxilla was stable in the long term. On the other hand, the UCLP control group showed hardly any growth at the maxillary level during the long-term follow-up period. Our results showed that the Alt-RAMEC technique, performed at the correct time, with a double-hinged expander, followed by class III spring or elastic traction, 24 hours per day, allows for satisfactory maxillary protraction, with, at this stage, apparently stable long-term results. Nevertheless, as only 50% of the patients had long-term follow-up data, we are still unable to predict the percentage of patients which will not eventually need orthognathic surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29702006
doi: 10.1177/1055665618772395
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM