Comparative effects of different dietary approaches on blood pressure in hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.


Journal

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition
ISSN: 1549-7852
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8914818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
pubmed: 3 5 2018
medline: 1 2 2020
entrez: 3 5 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pairwise meta-analyses have shown beneficial effects of individual dietary approaches on blood pressure but their comparative effects have not been established. Therefore we performed a systematic review of different dietary intervention trials and estimated the aggregate blood pressure effects through network meta-analysis including hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients. PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched until June 2017. The inclusion criteria were defined as follows: i) Randomized trial with a dietary approach; ii) hypertensive and pre-hypertensive adult patients; and iii) minimum intervention period of 12 weeks. In order to determine the pooled effect of each intervention relative to each of the other intervention for both diastolic and systolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), random effects network meta-analysis was performed. A total of 67 trials comparing 13 dietary approaches (DASH, low-fat, moderate-carbohydrate, high-protein, low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean, Palaeolithic, vegetarian, low-GI/GL, low-sodium, Nordic, Tibetan, and control) enrolling 17,230 participants were included. In the network meta-analysis, the DASH, Mediterranean, low-carbohydrate, Palaeolithic, high-protein, low-glycaemic index, low-sodium, and low-fat dietary approaches were significantly more effective in reducing SBP (-8.73 to -2.32 mmHg) and DBP (-4.85 to -1.27 mmHg) compared to a control diet. According to the SUCRAs, the DASH diet was ranked the most effective dietary approach in reducing SBP (90%) and DBP (91%), followed by the Palaeolithic, and the low-carbohydrate diet (ranked 3rd for SBP) or the Mediterranean diet (ranked 3rd for DBP). For most comparisons, the credibility of evidence was rated very low to moderate, with the exception for the DASH vs. the low-fat dietary approach for which the quality of evidence was rated high. The present network meta-analysis suggests that the DASH dietary approach might be the most effective dietary measure to reduce blood pressure among hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients based on high quality evidence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pairwise meta-analyses have shown beneficial effects of individual dietary approaches on blood pressure but their comparative effects have not been established.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Therefore we performed a systematic review of different dietary intervention trials and estimated the aggregate blood pressure effects through network meta-analysis including hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients.
DESIGN METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched until June 2017. The inclusion criteria were defined as follows: i) Randomized trial with a dietary approach; ii) hypertensive and pre-hypertensive adult patients; and iii) minimum intervention period of 12 weeks. In order to determine the pooled effect of each intervention relative to each of the other intervention for both diastolic and systolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), random effects network meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 67 trials comparing 13 dietary approaches (DASH, low-fat, moderate-carbohydrate, high-protein, low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean, Palaeolithic, vegetarian, low-GI/GL, low-sodium, Nordic, Tibetan, and control) enrolling 17,230 participants were included. In the network meta-analysis, the DASH, Mediterranean, low-carbohydrate, Palaeolithic, high-protein, low-glycaemic index, low-sodium, and low-fat dietary approaches were significantly more effective in reducing SBP (-8.73 to -2.32 mmHg) and DBP (-4.85 to -1.27 mmHg) compared to a control diet. According to the SUCRAs, the DASH diet was ranked the most effective dietary approach in reducing SBP (90%) and DBP (91%), followed by the Palaeolithic, and the low-carbohydrate diet (ranked 3rd for SBP) or the Mediterranean diet (ranked 3rd for DBP). For most comparisons, the credibility of evidence was rated very low to moderate, with the exception for the DASH vs. the low-fat dietary approach for which the quality of evidence was rated high.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The present network meta-analysis suggests that the DASH dietary approach might be the most effective dietary measure to reduce blood pressure among hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients based on high quality evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29718689
doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1463967
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2674-2687

Auteurs

Lukas Schwingshackl (L)

Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE) , Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, Nuthetal , Germany.
NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research Berlin-Potsdam , Nuthetal , Germany.

Anna Chaimani (A)

Paris Descartes University , Paris , France.
INSERM, UMR1153 Epidemiology and Statistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), METHODS Team , Paris , France.
Cochrane France , Paris , France.

Carolina Schwedhelm (C)

Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE) , Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, Nuthetal , Germany.
NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research Berlin-Potsdam , Nuthetal , Germany.

Estefania Toledo (E)

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra , Calle Irunlarrea 1, Pamplona , Spain.
Centro del Investigación Biomédica en Red de la Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN) , Av. Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid , Spain.
IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research , Calle Irunlarrea 3, Pamplona , Spain.

Marina Pünsch (M)

Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE) , Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, Nuthetal , Germany.

Georg Hoffmann (G)

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna , Althanstraße 14, Vienna , Austria.

Heiner Boeing (H)

Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE) , Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, Nuthetal , Germany.
NutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research Berlin-Potsdam , Nuthetal , Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH