Placement of lumen-apposing metal stents to drain pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis can be safely performed on an outpatient basis: A multicenter study.

Acute pancreatitis endosonography pancreatic fluid collections

Journal

Endoscopic ultrasound
ISSN: 2303-9027
Titre abrégé: Endosc Ultrasound
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101622292

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 18 5 2018
medline: 18 5 2018
entrez: 18 5 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

No study on the use of lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent (LAMS) to drain pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has evaluated outcomes of patients in the outpatient setting. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, success rate, and adverse events of the LAMS for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of patients with symptomatic PFCs on an inpatient versus an outpatient basis. This was a multicenter, retrospective study conducted at 4 tertiary care centers. We identified eighty patients with PFCs in whom EUS-guided transmural drainage using the LAMS was performed. The mean age of the patients was 53.1 years old. Mean size of the PFC was 11.8 ± 5.1 cm. A total of 33 patients had PFCs drained in an outpatient setting while 47 patients underwent PFC drainage as inpatients. The overall technical success (ability to access and drain a PFC by placement of transmural stents) was 98.7% (79 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the technical success rate between the inpatient and outpatient groups (100% vs. 98%, respectively, P = 1). There was no significant difference in resolution of PFCs in the inpatient and outpatient groups (91% vs. 87% respectively; P = 1). The number of procedures required for PFC resolution was significantly lower in the inpatient group as compared to the outpatients (2.3 vs. 3.1 respectively, P = 0.025). Procedure-related adverse events were significantly lower in the inpatient group compared to the outpatient group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the 2 groups in terms of development of adverse events requiring endoscopic reintervention within 30 days of initial stent placement (P = 0.69). This study shows that LAMS placement for PFCs can be performed safely on an outpatient basis with overall technical and clinical outcomes that are comparable to those seen in inpatients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
No study on the use of lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent (LAMS) to drain pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has evaluated outcomes of patients in the outpatient setting. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, success rate, and adverse events of the LAMS for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of patients with symptomatic PFCs on an inpatient versus an outpatient basis.
METHODS METHODS
This was a multicenter, retrospective study conducted at 4 tertiary care centers.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified eighty patients with PFCs in whom EUS-guided transmural drainage using the LAMS was performed. The mean age of the patients was 53.1 years old. Mean size of the PFC was 11.8 ± 5.1 cm. A total of 33 patients had PFCs drained in an outpatient setting while 47 patients underwent PFC drainage as inpatients. The overall technical success (ability to access and drain a PFC by placement of transmural stents) was 98.7% (79 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the technical success rate between the inpatient and outpatient groups (100% vs. 98%, respectively, P = 1). There was no significant difference in resolution of PFCs in the inpatient and outpatient groups (91% vs. 87% respectively; P = 1). The number of procedures required for PFC resolution was significantly lower in the inpatient group as compared to the outpatients (2.3 vs. 3.1 respectively, P = 0.025). Procedure-related adverse events were significantly lower in the inpatient group compared to the outpatient group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the 2 groups in terms of development of adverse events requiring endoscopic reintervention within 30 days of initial stent placement (P = 0.69).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that LAMS placement for PFCs can be performed safely on an outpatient basis with overall technical and clinical outcomes that are comparable to those seen in inpatients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29770780
pii: 232608
doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_30_17
pmc: PMC6400089
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

36-42

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Douglas G. Adler is a speaker and consultant for Boston Scientific Janak Shah is a consultant for Boston Scientific Jose Nieto is a speaker and consultant for Boston Scientific Kenneth Binmoeller is a consultant for Boston Scientific and inventor of the LAMS Yasser Bhat has no conflicts of interest Linda Jo Taylor has no conflicts of interest Ali A. Siddiqui is a consultant for Boston Scientific.

Références

J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;3(1):44-9
pubmed: 10457323
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Dec;1(4):240-5
pubmed: 1669412
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010 Feb;9(1):60-4
pubmed: 20133231
JOP. 2011 Mar 09;12(2):177-80
pubmed: 21386648
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug;45(7):614-25
pubmed: 21750432
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):870-6
pubmed: 22301347
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11
pubmed: 23100216
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1428-34
pubmed: 23232994
Endoscopy. 2015 Jan;47(1):63-7
pubmed: 25268308
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1039-46
pubmed: 26014960
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Apr;83(4):699-707
pubmed: 26515956
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 7;21(41):11842-53
pubmed: 26557008
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:693040
pubmed: 26587018
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 21;22(7):2256-70
pubmed: 26900288
Clin Endosc. 2016 Mar;49(2):131-8
pubmed: 27000424
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 14;4:CD011392
pubmed: 27075711
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):758-765
pubmed: 27566053
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Aug;91(8):1485-6
pubmed: 8759645
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Aug;91(8):1499-502
pubmed: 8759649
Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Oct;44(4):443-9
pubmed: 8905366
Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Mar;45(3):225-30
pubmed: 9087827

Auteurs

Douglas G Adler (DG)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Janak Shah (J)

Division of Gastroenterology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Jose Nieto (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Borland-Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Kenneth Binmoeller (K)

Division of Gastroenterology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Yasser Bhat (Y)

Division of Gastroenterology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Linda Jo Taylor (LJ)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Ali A Siddiqui (AA)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Classifications MeSH