Sensory analysis of characterising flavours: evaluating tobacco product odours using an expert panel.


Journal

Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 14 11 2017
revised: 30 03 2018
accepted: 24 04 2018
pubmed: 25 5 2018
medline: 12 9 2019
entrez: 25 5 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tobacco flavours are an important regulatory concept in several jurisdictions, for example in the USA, Canada and Europe. The European Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU prohibits cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco having a characterising flavour. This directive defines characterising flavour as 'a clearly noticeable smell or taste other than one of tobacco […]'. To distinguish between products with and without a characterising flavour, we trained an expert panel to identify characterising flavours by smelling. An expert panel (n=18) evaluated the smell of 20 tobacco products using self-defined odour attributes, following Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. The panel was trained during 14 attribute training, consensus training and performance monitoring sessions. Products were assessed during six test sessions. Principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering (four and six clusters) and Hotelling's T-tests (95% and 99% CIs) were used to determine differences and similarities between tobacco products based on odour attributes. The final attribute list contained 13 odour descriptors. Panel performance was sufficient after 14 training sessions. Products marketed as unflavoured that formed a cluster were considered reference products. A four-cluster method distinguished cherry-flavoured, vanilla-flavoured and menthol-flavoured products from reference products. Six clusters subdivided reference products into tobacco leaves, roll-your-own and commercial products. An expert panel was successfully trained to assess characterising odours in cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco. This method could be applied to other product types such as e-cigarettes. Regulatory decisions on the choice of reference products and significance level are needed which directly influences the products being assessed as having a characterising odour.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29792305
pii: tobaccocontrol-2017-054152
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054152
pmc: PMC6580788
doi:

Substances chimiques

Flavoring Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

152-160

Informations de copyright

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: This manuscript is an adaptation of part of the report entitled ‘Mapping of best practices and development of testing methods and procedures for identification of characterizing flavors in tobacco products’ written by the HETOC Consortium, consisting of the same authors as the current manuscript.

Références

J Dairy Sci. 2001 Jan;84(1):12-20
pubmed: 11210023
Tob Control. 2004 Sep;13(3):211-2
pubmed: 15333865
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Nov-Dec;24(6):1601-10
pubmed: 16284034
Am J Public Health. 2006 Feb;96(2):244-51
pubmed: 16380563
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;264(3):237-43
pubmed: 17021776
Am J Public Health. 2008 Sep;98(9):1685-92
pubmed: 18633084
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Dec;18(12):3225-40
pubmed: 19959675
J Chromatogr A. 2013 Sep 6;1306:72-9
pubmed: 23899381
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jul;16(7):984-91
pubmed: 24610479
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3:iii3-9
pubmed: 24935895
Arch Toxicol. 2015 Aug;89(8):1241-55
pubmed: 26138682
Arch Toxicol. 2015 Aug;89(8):1395-8
pubmed: 26138684
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Apr 1;161:9-14
pubmed: 26774948
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Nov 11;5:33-40
pubmed: 27896041
Chem Senses. 2017 Mar 1;42(3):233-238
pubmed: 28034900
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):105-111
pubmed: 28190004
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):139-151
pubmed: 28318902
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 23;14(4):
pubmed: 28333107
Chem Senses. 1997 Feb;22(1):39-52
pubmed: 9056084

Auteurs

Erna J Z Krüsemann (EJZ)

Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Marlou P Lasschuijt (MP)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

C de Graaf (C)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

René A de Wijk (RA)

Division of Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Pieter H Punter (PH)

OP&P Product Research BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Loes van Tiel (L)

OP&P Product Research BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Johannes W J M Cremers (JWJM)

Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Suzanne van de Nobelen (S)

Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Sanne Boesveldt (S)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Reinskje Talhout (R)

Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH