Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.


Journal

Psychological research
ISSN: 1430-2772
Titre abrégé: Psychol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0435062

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 08 02 2018
accepted: 23 05 2018
pubmed: 31 5 2018
medline: 4 1 2020
entrez: 31 5 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As part of filtering irrelevant information from entering visual working memory (VWM) and selecting only the relevant information for further processing the system should first tag the pieces of information as relevant or irrelevant. We manipulated difficulty of tagging items as relevant or irrelevant by applying perceptual grouping cues to investigate if it can improve filtering performance in VWM. Participants performed a change-detection task with three targets, six targets, or three targets and three distractors (filtering condition) in the memory display, and were asked to remember the colors (Experiments 1-2) or the orientations (Experiments 3-5) of the targets and ignore the distractors. In the filtering conditions, either the targets (Experiments 1, 3, and 4) or the distractors (Experiments 2 and 5) formed an illusory object (a Kanizsa triangle), appeared in a triangle-like configuration (grouping by proximity), or appeared at random positions (non-grouping). Grouping the targets improved filtering performance relative to non-grouping. Moreover, the illusory object cue further improved filtering performance beyond a proximity cue, but only when the cue was compatible with the task. When the distractors were grouped, the proximity cue improved filtering performance, and the illusory object cue, despite being a potent grouping cue, failed to improve filtering performance when it was compatible with the task. We suggest that the grouping cues advanced tagging of the grouped items. Yet, when the grouping cue strongly enhanced processing of the distractors, the tagging failed, such that the preliminary process of estimating incoming items led to full processing of the grouped items.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29845437
doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1032-5
pii: 10.1007/s00426-018-1032-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1656-1672

Subventions

Organisme : Israel Science Foundation (IL)
ID : 1696-13

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):391-400
pubmed: 23850263
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29;113(13):3693-8
pubmed: 26903654
Brain Res. 2011 Aug 11;1406:30-42
pubmed: 21757188
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:197-206
pubmed: 24878830
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Apr;8(2):194-214
pubmed: 6461717
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):741-53
pubmed: 12201333
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):673-9
pubmed: 21037165
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Feb;112(1):61-71
pubmed: 12653414
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:277-88
pubmed: 26500190
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90
pubmed: 24203555
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):764-70
pubmed: 12201335
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1282-9
pubmed: 23702981
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May;27(5):853-65
pubmed: 25436671
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 28;5:265
pubmed: 24734026
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):5-6
pubmed: 18160954
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2270-83
pubmed: 26018644
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1754-68
pubmed: 17489300
Vis cogn. 2009 Apr;17(3):356-372
pubmed: 19430536
Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):361-8
pubmed: 21310945
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
pubmed: 2034749
Cereb Cortex. 2011 May;21(5):1147-54
pubmed: 20884722
Brain. 2010 Sep;133(9):2677-89
pubmed: 20688815
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):80-7
pubmed: 12747493
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):760-75
pubmed: 18564048
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Apr;16(2):207-18
pubmed: 26450507
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Aug;34(4):842-53
pubmed: 18665730
Brain. 2010 Sep;133(9):2702-13
pubmed: 20624814
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e40106
pubmed: 22768232
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44
pubmed: 1431742
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):902-14
pubmed: 26704563
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):317-29
pubmed: 8189195
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):77-86
pubmed: 23066799
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jun;71:1-26
pubmed: 24531497
Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):369-78
pubmed: 3226885
Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
pubmed: 9384378
Cognition. 2012 May;123(2):308-12
pubmed: 22306190
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar;62:100-8
pubmed: 26802451
Psychol Res. 2010 Sep;74(5):457-67
pubmed: 19937451
Vision Res. 2016 Sep;126:34-51
pubmed: 26440865
Nature. 2006 Mar 2;440(7080):91-5
pubmed: 16382240
Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1172-217
pubmed: 22845751
Vision Res. 2003 Aug;43(18):1915-9
pubmed: 12831754
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1432-8
pubmed: 22449133
Cognition. 2017 Jul;164:74-86
pubmed: 28391134
Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5
pubmed: 18385672
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 4;114(14):3744-3749
pubmed: 28325878
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 17;8:196
pubmed: 28261131
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Feb;51(2):145-62
pubmed: 1549433
J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 1;32(31):10725-36
pubmed: 22855820
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1819-28
pubmed: 24564468
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1455-70
pubmed: 20675793
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Dec;113(4):501-17
pubmed: 6240521
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 8;29(27):8726-33
pubmed: 19587279
Nature. 1994 Oct 27;371(6500):791-3
pubmed: 7935838
Vis cogn. 2011 Aug;19(7):956-972
pubmed: 22053147
Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51
pubmed: 15085132
Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):42-100
pubmed: 16039935
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):92-114
pubmed: 11248943
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May;25(5):743-53
pubmed: 23249354
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):690-6
pubmed: 21484507
Brain. 2009 Apr;132(Pt 4):1057-66
pubmed: 19293236
Vision Res. 2000;40(19):2653-9
pubmed: 10958915
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8
pubmed: 17614871
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Oct;7(7):752-63
pubmed: 21896495
Neuropsychology. 2013 Mar;27(2):220-9
pubmed: 23527650
Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):399-405
pubmed: 21317371
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):960-7
pubmed: 24512609
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):166-72
pubmed: 17546748
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989 Sep;118(3):258-79
pubmed: 2527950
J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 Nov;115(4):658-73
pubmed: 17100524
Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):500-3
pubmed: 16306992
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 21;108(25):10367-71
pubmed: 21646524
Dev Psychobiol. 2014 May;56(4):601-10
pubmed: 23775219
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):103-7
pubmed: 18066057
Sci Am. 1976 Apr;234(4):48-52
pubmed: 1257734

Auteurs

Ayala S Allon (AS)

The School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. ayalaallon@gmail.com.
Sagol School of Neuroscience, Minducate Research and Innovation Center for Science of Learning, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. ayalaallon@gmail.com.

Gili Vixman (G)

The School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Roy Luria (R)

The School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH