Attitudes towards vasectomy and its acceptance as a method of contraception among clinical-year medical students in a Malaysian private medical college.
Malaysia
acceptance
attitude
medical students
vasectomy
Journal
Singapore medical journal
ISSN: 2737-5935
Titre abrégé: Singapore Med J
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0404516
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
8
6
2018
medline:
23
8
2019
entrez:
8
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study explored attitudes towards vasectomy and its acceptance as a method of contraception among clinical-year medical students, and determined the association between their demographic characteristics, and attitudes and acceptance. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among clinical-year medical students from a Malaysian private medical college using a self-administered questionnaire. There were 330 participants with a female preponderance and a mean age of 22.0 ± 1.1 years. The largest proportion of respondents were from Year 3. The vast majority were ethnically Malay (91.8%) and followed Islam (92.4%). Overall, 60.9% of participants had a positive attitude towards vasectomy and 76.0% showed good acceptance. Gender, academic year, ethnicity and religion variables were not associated with attitudes and acceptance (p > 0.05). A significantly higher proportion of male respondents thought that vasectomy was religiously forbidden and would give a bad impression. A significantly higher proportion of Year 5 students agreed to the statement 'I would recommend vasectomy to relatives, friends and people close to me' compared to Year 3 and 4 students. Students' perception of vasectomy as a contraceptive method was encouraging. Our results suggest that their knowledge improved as medical training progressed, and attitudes evolved for the better irrespective of their traditional, cultural and religious beliefs - highlighting the importance of providing students with evidence-based learning about male sterilisation, which is more cost-effective and is associated with lower morbidity than female sterilisation. A qualitative study involving students from different ethnicities and religions would provide a better understanding of this subject.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29876579
pii: j60/2/97
doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018065
pmc: PMC6395838
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
97-103Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.
Références
Contraception. 2001 Sep;64(3):155-9
pubmed: 11704094
Niger J Med. 2006 Jul-Sep;15(3):260-5
pubmed: 17111755
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Feb;30(2):129-137
pubmed: 18254994
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2009 Sep;16(3):203-6
pubmed: 19767907
Contraception. 2010 Sep;82(3):230-5
pubmed: 20705150
J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):2068-72
pubmed: 20850832
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2011 May 08;10(1):5
pubmed: 21549000
Contraception. 2012 Jun;85(6):552-7
pubmed: 22133657
Ghana Med J. 2011 Sep;45(3):101-4
pubmed: 22282576
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jul;28(3):292-6
pubmed: 23204657
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 11;3(12):e003739
pubmed: 24334156
Curr Urol. 2012 May;6(1):15-20
pubmed: 24917704
East Afr Med J. 2013 Mar;90(3):89-94
pubmed: 26866107
Reprod Health. 2017 Feb 8;14(1):21
pubmed: 28178993
Stud Fam Plann. 1988 Jul-Aug;19(4):236-43
pubmed: 3176096
Am J Public Health. 1985 Apr;75(4):370-4
pubmed: 3976963