Complex pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): successful management with robotic assistance.
Adult
Constriction, Pathologic
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Hydronephrosis
/ etiology
Kidney Pelvis
/ pathology
Laparoscopy
/ methods
Male
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Ureter
/ pathology
Ureteral Obstruction
/ complications
Urologic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Complex PUJO
Giant hydronephrosis
Nephroplication
Ureterocalycostomy
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
10
02
2018
accepted:
31
05
2018
pubmed:
8
6
2018
medline:
22
6
2019
entrez:
8
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The management of complex pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) is challenging. The traditional open surgical approach used large incisions with prolonged post-operative recovery. Laparoscopic reconstruction in complex PUJO requires surgical expertise and is challenging to master. Robotic assistance has provided a viable minimally invasive alternative replicating the open surgical approach for such complex cases. In the present study, we evaluated the feasibility and success of robot-assisted reconstructive procedures in such situations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29876692
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0829-y
pii: 10.1007/s11701-018-0829-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
121-127Références
Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Hemal AK (2010) Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction. World J Urol 28(5):599–602
doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0469-y
pubmed: 19711084
Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ (2003) Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 44(3):340–345
doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5
pubmed: 12932933
Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2007) Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre. BJU Int 100(4):880–885
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07032.x
pubmed: 17535275
Peters CA (2008) Robotic pyeloplasty: the new standard of care? J Urol 180(4):1223–1224
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.087
pubmed: 18707738
Patel V (2005) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 66(1):45–49
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.01.053
pubmed: 15992879
Hemal AK, Mishra S, Mukharjee S, Suryavanshi M (2008) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Int J Urol 15(8):744–746
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02091.x
pubmed: 18786197
Atug F, Castle EP, Burgess SV, Thomas R (2005) Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int 96(9):1365–1368
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05819.x
pubmed: 16287459
Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM (2003) Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 17(3):155–160
doi: 10.1089/089277903321618716
pubmed: 12803987
Stein RJ, Gill IS, Desai MM (2007) Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Curr Urol Rep 8(2):140–149
doi: 10.1007/s11934-007-0064-y
pubmed: 17303020
Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1795–1799
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35898-6
pubmed: 8230507
Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2003) Laparoscopic reconstructive urology. J Urol 170(4):1070–1078
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000073207.06071.dc
pubmed: 14501695
Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG (2006) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 67(5):932–936
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.024
pubmed: 16635516
Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60(1):39–45
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01717-X
pubmed: 12100918
Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G (2002) A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 42(5):453–458
doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00373-1
pubmed: 12429153
Gupta NP, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Mukherjee S, Kumar R, Dogra PN (2010) Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-center experience. BJU Int 105(7):980–983
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08983.x
pubmed: 19874304