Experimental examination of pollinator-mediated selection in a sexually deceptive orchid.
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 01 2019
23 01 2019
Historique:
received:
18
12
2017
accepted:
30
04
2018
pubmed:
8
6
2018
medline:
28
12
2019
entrez:
8
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Selection exerted by pollinators on flowers is predicted to occur along two distinct axes. While pollinator attraction to flowers is governed by pollinator preferences, pollen transfer efficiency is mediated by the mechanical fit of pollinators to flower morphology. Although pollinator attraction in sexually deceptive orchids is typically underpinned by floral odour, morphological traits are expected to play a vital role in mechanical fit during floral contact with pollinators. Here we utilize a comprehensive and novel procedure to test for pollinator-mediated selection through mechanical fit with the flower labellum in the orchid Chiloglottis trapeziformis. This approach combines detailed pollinator observations related to plant reproductive fitness with complementary experimental manipulation and phenotypic selection analysis. Experiments with virgin flowers revealed that pollen removal occurs only during vigorous pseudocopulation. This behaviour involves male wasps that grasp the insectiform callus structure on the labellum while probing the labellum tip in a forward orientation. Both orientation and duration of pseudocopulation were significant predictors of pollen removal, confirming a direct relationship between pollinator behaviour and plant fitness. Controlled floral manipulation that either shortened or elongated the distance between the callus and the labellum tip detected no change in pollinator attraction. The duration of pseudocopulation, however, was significantly reduced on flowers with shortened or elongated callus-tip distances, consistent with stabilizing selection. Phenotypic selection analysis confirmed this prediction in natural populations by uncovering evidence for stabilizing selection on the distance between the callus and the labellum tip. Our experimental manipulations and selection analysis in natural populations thus demonstrate stabilizing selection on the distance from the callus to the labellum tip, and illustrate the utility of employing multiple approaches to confirm selection exerted by pollinators on floral form.
Sections du résumé
Background and Aims
Selection exerted by pollinators on flowers is predicted to occur along two distinct axes. While pollinator attraction to flowers is governed by pollinator preferences, pollen transfer efficiency is mediated by the mechanical fit of pollinators to flower morphology. Although pollinator attraction in sexually deceptive orchids is typically underpinned by floral odour, morphological traits are expected to play a vital role in mechanical fit during floral contact with pollinators.
Methods
Here we utilize a comprehensive and novel procedure to test for pollinator-mediated selection through mechanical fit with the flower labellum in the orchid Chiloglottis trapeziformis. This approach combines detailed pollinator observations related to plant reproductive fitness with complementary experimental manipulation and phenotypic selection analysis.
Key Results
Experiments with virgin flowers revealed that pollen removal occurs only during vigorous pseudocopulation. This behaviour involves male wasps that grasp the insectiform callus structure on the labellum while probing the labellum tip in a forward orientation. Both orientation and duration of pseudocopulation were significant predictors of pollen removal, confirming a direct relationship between pollinator behaviour and plant fitness. Controlled floral manipulation that either shortened or elongated the distance between the callus and the labellum tip detected no change in pollinator attraction. The duration of pseudocopulation, however, was significantly reduced on flowers with shortened or elongated callus-tip distances, consistent with stabilizing selection. Phenotypic selection analysis confirmed this prediction in natural populations by uncovering evidence for stabilizing selection on the distance between the callus and the labellum tip.
Conclusions
Our experimental manipulations and selection analysis in natural populations thus demonstrate stabilizing selection on the distance from the callus to the labellum tip, and illustrate the utility of employing multiple approaches to confirm selection exerted by pollinators on floral form.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29878057
pii: 5033997
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy083
pmc: PMC6344214
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
347-354Références
Evolution. 1995 Feb;49(1):207-214
pubmed: 28593671
Science. 2003 Oct 17;302(5644):437-8
pubmed: 14564006
Evolution. 1996 Feb;50(1):437-442
pubmed: 28568868
Evolution. 2008 Jan;62(1):220-5
pubmed: 18067570
J Evol Biol. 2015 Aug;28(8):1526-41
pubmed: 26079670
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jun 22;279(1737):2309-13
pubmed: 22298842
New Phytol. 2014 Aug;203(3):939-52
pubmed: 24697806
Evolution. 2015 Sep;69(9):2262-75
pubmed: 26194119
Evolution. 2000 Dec;54(6):1995-2006
pubmed: 11209776
J Evol Biol. 2017 Nov;30(11):1978-1993
pubmed: 28787530
Evolution. 2011 Feb;65(2):350-64
pubmed: 20874738
Am J Bot. 2009 Apr;96(4):793-801
pubmed: 21628234
Am Nat. 2010 Nov;176(5):E143-51
pubmed: 20843263
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):251-66
pubmed: 24252281
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 19;369(1649):20130563
pubmed: 25002705
J Evol Biol. 2017 Sep;30(9):1674-1691
pubmed: 28714217
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(2):385-92
pubmed: 20497348
Oecologia. 1990 Oct;84(4):457-460
pubmed: 28312960
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):341-55
pubmed: 24052555
J Evol Biol. 2009 Nov;22(11):2354-62
pubmed: 20069726
Curr Biol. 2017 Jul 10;27(13):1867-1877.e5
pubmed: 28625782
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226
pubmed: 28556011
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Jul 10;56(29):8455-8458
pubmed: 28470835
Evolution. 2005 Jul;59(7):1449-63
pubmed: 16153031
Evolution. 1989 Jul;43(4):882-890
pubmed: 28564200
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 22;277(1695):2811-9
pubmed: 20444715
Oecologia. 1987 Oct;73(4):522-524
pubmed: 28311968
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 12;96(21):11910-5
pubmed: 10518550
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):33-75
pubmed: 20377574
Evolution. 2013 Jun;67(6):1706-14
pubmed: 23730763
New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):530-45
pubmed: 19552694
Ann Bot. 2013 Jan;111(1):21-30
pubmed: 23091095
Evolution. 2008 Sep;62(9):2435-40
pubmed: 18616573
Evolution. 2009 Jan;63(1):268-79
pubmed: 19146595
Phytochemistry. 2011 Sep;72(13):1667-77
pubmed: 21497864
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(2):437-50
pubmed: 20561345
Evolution. 2009 May;63(5):1292-300
pubmed: 19154392
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016 Aug;32:37-46
pubmed: 27368084
Ann Bot. 2011 May;107(6):981-92
pubmed: 21402538
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(2):393-402
pubmed: 20723076