In vivo biocompatibility and time-dependent changes in mechanical properties of woven collagen meshes: A comparison to xenograft and synthetic mid-urethral sling materials.
collagen
stress urinary incontinence
tissue engineering
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
ISSN: 1552-4981
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
27
05
2017
revised:
23
02
2018
accepted:
25
03
2018
pubmed:
14
6
2018
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
14
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Meshes woven from highly aligned collagen threads crosslinked using either genipin or 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carboiimide and N-hydroxy succinimide (EDC/NHS) were implanted in a subcutaneous rat model to evaluate their biocompatibility (at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 5 months), mechanical properties (at baseline, 2 months, and 5 months) and ultimately their suitability for use as mid-urethral slings (MUS) for management of stress urinary incontinence. Porcine dermal (Xenmatrix) and monofilament polypropylene (Prolene) meshes were also implanted to provide comparison to clinically used materials. Quantitative histological scoring showed tissue integration in Xenmatrix was almost absent, while the open network of woven collagen and Prolene meshes allowed for cellular and tissue integration. However, strength and stiffness of genipin-crosslinked collagen (GCC), Prolene, and Xenmatrix meshes were not significantly different from those of native rectus fascia and vaginal tissues of animals at 5 months. EDC/NHS-crosslinked collagen (ECC) meshes were degraded so extensively at five months that samples could only be used for histological staining. Picrosirius red and Masson's trichrome staining revealed that integrated tissue within GCC meshes was more aligned (p = 0.02) and appeared more concentrated than ECC meshes at 5 months. Furthermore, immunohistochemical staining showed that GCC meshes attracted a greater number of cells expressing markers for M2 macrophages, those associated with regeneration, than ECC meshes (p = 0.01 for CD206+ cells, p = 0.001 CD163+ cells) at 5 months. As such, GCC meshes hold promise as a new MUS biomaterial based on favorable induction of fibrous tissue resulting in mechanical stiffness matching that of native tissue. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 479-489, 2019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29897162
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34138
pmc: PMC7335430
mid: NIHMS1603708
doi:
Substances chimiques
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
479-489Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR063701
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R21 HD095439
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Eur Spine J. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 4:467-79
pubmed: 19005702
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Oct;14(4):239-43; discussion 243
pubmed: 14530834
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Jan;31(1):13-21
pubmed: 22038890
Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Jan;39(1):549-58
pubmed: 20824342
Indian J Urol. 2010 Apr;26(2):221-9
pubmed: 20877601
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:968087
pubmed: 25977927
BJU Int. 2015 Jun;115(6):968-77
pubmed: 24961647
Basic Res Cardiol. 1994 Sep-Oct;89(5):397-410
pubmed: 7535519
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2767-78
pubmed: 22538685
BJOG. 2013 Jan;120(2):224-232
pubmed: 23240801
Pharm Biol. 2016 Nov;54(11):2555-2559
pubmed: 27180834
J Histochem Cytochem. 2002 Nov;50(11):1469-74
pubmed: 12417612
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1643-8
pubmed: 15902171
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Feb;101(2):385-93
pubmed: 22847997
Rev Urol. 2001;3 Suppl 1:S2-6
pubmed: 16985992
J Ethnopharmacol. 2006 Feb 20;103(3):496-500
pubmed: 16169698
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1265-9
pubmed: 23563892
Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Jun;58(4):518-32
pubmed: 15897038
Adv Funct Mater. 2014 Sep 24;24(36):5762-5770
pubmed: 25750610
BJU Int. 2005 Sep;96(4):664-9
pubmed: 16104928
BJU Int. 2004 Jul;94(1):110-3
pubmed: 15217442