Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training: Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia.
Anatomy
/ education
Clinical Competence
Humans
Internet
/ statistics & numerical data
Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Organs at Risk
/ anatomy & histology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
/ standards
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ standards
Radiation Oncologists
/ education
Radiation Oncology
/ education
Russia
Surveys and Questionnaires
Clinical target volume
Global oncology
Organs at risk
RUSSCO
Radiation oncology
Russia
eContour.org
Journal
Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education
ISSN: 1543-0154
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
26
6
2018
medline:
10
6
2020
entrez:
26
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Radiation oncologists in Russia face a number of unique professional difficulties including lack of standardized training and continuing medical education. To combat this, under the auspices of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our group has developed a series of ongoing in-person interactive contouring workshops that are held during the major Russian oncology conferences in Moscow, Russia. Since November 2016 during each workshop, we utilized a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas as part of our didactics. We sought to determine the impact of this resource on radiation oncology practice in Russia. We distributed an IRB-approved web-based survey to 172 practicing radiation oncologists in Russia. We inquired about practice demographics, RUSSCO contouring workshop attendance, and the clinical use of open-access English language interactive contouring atlas (eContour). The survey remained open for 2 months until November 2017. Eighty radiation oncologists completed the survey with a 46.5% response rate. Mean number of years in practice was 13.7. Sixty respondents (75%) attended at least one RUSSCO contouring workshop. Of those who were aware of eContour, 76% were introduced during a RUSSCO contouring workshop, and 81% continue to use it in their daily practice. The greatest obstacles to using the program were language barrier (51%) and internet access (38%). Nearly 90% reported their contouring practices changed since they started using the program, particularly for delineation of clinical target volumes (57%) and/or organs at risk (46%). More than 97% found the clinical pearls/links to cooperative group protocols in the software helpful in their daily practice. The majority used the contouring program several times per month (43%) or several times per week (41%). Face-to-face contouring instruction in combination with open-access web-based interactive contouring resource had a meaningful impact on perceived quality of radiation oncology contours among Russian practitioners and has the potential to have applications worldwide.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29938298
doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1388-7
pii: 10.1007/s13187-018-1388-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
871-873Références
Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jan 27;6:10
pubmed: 21272369
Radiother Oncol. 1998 Jun;47(3):285-92
pubmed: 9681892
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):220-224
pubmed: 28068229
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 1;98(3):547-554
pubmed: 28262474
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):527-32
pubmed: 22342091
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15;89(4):804-13
pubmed: 24969794
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar-Apr;5(2):e67-75
pubmed: 25413413
Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317-22
pubmed: 7901634