Prevalence and topographical characteristics of keratoconus in patients with refractive errors in the Egyptian delta.
Egyptian delta
Keratoconus
Pentacam
Prevalence
Refractive errors
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
12
01
2018
accepted:
16
06
2018
pubmed:
26
6
2018
medline:
7
8
2019
entrez:
26
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study the prevalence of keratoconus (KC) and the topographical characteristics of the affected corneas in patients with refractive errors who were seeking refractive surgery in the Egyptian delta. A retrospective study covering four and half years (Jan 2012-June 2016) where the topographical data of 8124 participants were obtained from the records of a refractive center in the Nile delta region, Egypt. The diagnosis of KC was based on the Holladay criteria in one or both eyes, using the Pentacam scans, whereas grading of KC was based on the Amsler-Krumeich classification. The prevalence of KC was 1.12% (91/8124 participants) with 95% confidence interval 0.91-1.3. Of all the affected cases, 5 cases (5.5%) had unilateral, and the other 86 cases (94.5%) had bilateral KC. The affected and unaffected subjects did not show any significant difference regarding gender. Sixty-eight (38.4%) eyes had stage 1 KC, 53 eyes (29.9%) had stage 2, 27 eyes (15.3%) had stage 3, and 29 eyes (16.4%) had stage 4 KC. It was most prevalent (1.2%) among cases with astigmatism (P < 0.001). Keratoconus was found in 1.12% of patients seeking refractive surgery, with no gender preference. Most cases had bilateral affection. Astigmatism was the most common refractive error to be associated with keratoconus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29938312
doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0965-4
pii: 10.1007/s10792-018-0965-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Pagination
1459-1465Références
Clin Exp Optom. 2004 Mar;87(2):97-101
pubmed: 15040776
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004 Sep;27(7):779-82
pubmed: 15499275
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;89(11):1403-6
pubmed: 16234439
Eye (Lond). 2008 Apr;22(4):534-41
pubmed: 17237755
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Dec;85(8):890-2
pubmed: 17645421
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1530-8
pubmed: 17720066
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 May;145(5):813-8
pubmed: 18328998
Clin Exp Optom. 2009 Mar;92(2):110-8
pubmed: 18983633
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;37(1):14-29
pubmed: 19016811
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;148(5):760-5
pubmed: 19674732
J Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;25(10 Suppl):S958-62
pubmed: 19848378
Cornea. 2010 Feb;29(2):245
pubmed: 20098158
Ophthalmologica. 1946 Feb-Mar;111(2-3):96-101
pubmed: 20275788
J Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;26(11):847-9
pubmed: 21053870
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39313
pubmed: 22792169
Cornea. 2013 Nov;32(11):1441-5
pubmed: 24042484
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013 Jul;8(3):213-9
pubmed: 24349664
Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov - Dec;62(6):770-783
pubmed: 28688894
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr-Jun;32(2):114-118
pubmed: 29942179
Surv Ophthalmol. 1984 Jan-Feb;28(4):293-322
pubmed: 6230745
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994 May;35(6):2749-57
pubmed: 8188468
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Apr;24(4):456-63
pubmed: 9584238
Vestn Oftalmol. 1998 Jul-Aug;114(4):38-40
pubmed: 9771088