Using reappraisal to regulate negative emotion after the 2016 U.S. Presidential election: Does emotion regulation trump political action?


Journal

Journal of personality and social psychology
ISSN: 1939-1315
Titre abrégé: J Pers Soc Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0014171

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 29 6 2018
medline: 7 1 2020
entrez: 29 6 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Political action (volunteering, protesting) is central to functioning democracies, and action is often motivated by negative emotion. However, theories of emotion regulation suggest that people often strive to decrease such negative emotions. Thus, effective emotion regulation (e.g., reappraisal)-while helping people feel better-could have the unintended consequence of hindering political action. We tested this hypothesis in Clinton voters after the 2016 U.S. election (N

Identifiants

pubmed: 29952576
pii: 2018-31269-001
doi: 10.1037/pspp0000200
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

998-1015

Auteurs

Matthew Feinberg (M)

Rotman School of Management.

Phoebe Lam (P)

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.

Iris B Mauss (IB)

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

Oliver P John (OP)

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH