A comparison of different surfactants on foam stability in foam sclerotherapy in vitro.


Journal

Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 25 10 2017
accepted: 20 02 2018
pubmed: 30 6 2018
medline: 23 4 2019
entrez: 30 6 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This article compares the effect of different surfactants on foam stability and determines the foam decay relationship, so that the suitability of surfactants in a clinical setting can be evaluated. Five different surfactants were used to prepare sclerosing foam at room temperature using a liquid:gas ratio of 1:4 in vitro. Foam decay experiments were performed for each sample using a laboratory-made foaming apparatus, and the process was recorded using a video camera. The stability indices used included the drainage time, drainage rate, half-life, foam half-life volume, surfactant stability index, and foaming index. The sodium morrhuate foam was relatively more stable than the polidocanol foam, but exhibited weak foaming. After the addition of the surfactants, the foam half-life was less than 300 seconds. The effect of the surfactants on the stability of the sodium morrhuate foam was more pronounced. The surfactant stability indices could be arranged as follows: poloxamer 188 > Tween 80 > macrogol 4000 > propanediol > lecithin. However, the differences in the foaming indices were small. Of the five surfactants tested, poloxamer 188 has best performance to enhance sclerosing foam stability. The addition of the surfactants improved the stability of the sclerosing foams. It was observed that the relationships between the foam half-life and the surfactant stability index and the surfactant concentration follow the power law.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29954633
pii: S0741-5214(18)30432-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.033
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Lecithins 0
Polysorbates 0
Propylene Glycols 0
Sclerosing Solutions 0
Surface-Active Agents 0
Poloxamer 106392-12-5
Polyethylene Glycols 3WJQ0SDW1A

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

581-591.e1

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Taoping Bai (T)

Department of Applied Mechanics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Yuqiu Liu (Y)

College of Architecture & Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Jiche Liu (J)

College of Architecture & Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Chenhao Yu (C)

West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Wentao Jiang (W)

Department of Applied Mechanics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: scubme@aliyun.com.

Yubo Fan (Y)

School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH