Differentiating typical from atypical perpetration of sibling-directed aggression during the preschool years.


Journal

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines
ISSN: 1469-7610
Titre abrégé: J Child Psychol Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0375361

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
accepted: 14 05 2018
pubmed: 3 7 2018
medline: 23 7 2020
entrez: 3 7 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sibling aggression is common and often viewed as benign. Although sibling aggression can be harmful for the victims, it may also be a marker of clinical risk for the aggressor. We differentiated typical from atypical levels of perpetration of sibling-directed aggression among preschoolers, a developmental period in which aggression is a normative misbehavior, by (a) identifying how frequently aggressive behaviors targeted at a sibling must occur to be psychometrically atypical; (b) mapping the dimensional spectrum of sibling-directed aggression from typical, more commonly occurring behaviors to rarer, more atypical, actions; and (c) comparing the psychometric atypicality and typical-to-atypical spectrum of sibling-directed aggression and peer-directed aggression. Parents (N = 1,524) of 3- (39.2%), 4-(36.7%), and 5-(24.1%) year-olds (51.9% girls, 41.1% African-American, 31.9% Hispanic; 44.0% below the federal poverty line) completed the MAP-DB, which assesses how often children engage in aggressive behaviors. We used item-response theory (IRT) to address our objectives. Most aggressive behaviors toward siblings were psychometrically atypical when they occurred 'most days' or more; in contrast, most behaviors targeted at peers were atypical when they occurred 'some days' or more. With siblings, relational aggression was more atypical than verbal aggression, whereas with peers, both relational and physical aggression were more atypical than verbal aggression. In both relationships, the most typical behavior was a verbally aggressive action. Results were broadly replicated in a second, independent sample. These findings are a first step toward specifying features of sibling aggression that are markers of clinical risk and belie the notion that sibling aggression is inherently normative.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Sibling aggression is common and often viewed as benign. Although sibling aggression can be harmful for the victims, it may also be a marker of clinical risk for the aggressor. We differentiated typical from atypical levels of perpetration of sibling-directed aggression among preschoolers, a developmental period in which aggression is a normative misbehavior, by (a) identifying how frequently aggressive behaviors targeted at a sibling must occur to be psychometrically atypical; (b) mapping the dimensional spectrum of sibling-directed aggression from typical, more commonly occurring behaviors to rarer, more atypical, actions; and (c) comparing the psychometric atypicality and typical-to-atypical spectrum of sibling-directed aggression and peer-directed aggression.
METHODS
Parents (N = 1,524) of 3- (39.2%), 4-(36.7%), and 5-(24.1%) year-olds (51.9% girls, 41.1% African-American, 31.9% Hispanic; 44.0% below the federal poverty line) completed the MAP-DB, which assesses how often children engage in aggressive behaviors. We used item-response theory (IRT) to address our objectives.
RESULTS
Most aggressive behaviors toward siblings were psychometrically atypical when they occurred 'most days' or more; in contrast, most behaviors targeted at peers were atypical when they occurred 'some days' or more. With siblings, relational aggression was more atypical than verbal aggression, whereas with peers, both relational and physical aggression were more atypical than verbal aggression. In both relationships, the most typical behavior was a verbally aggressive action. Results were broadly replicated in a second, independent sample.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings are a first step toward specifying features of sibling aggression that are markers of clinical risk and belie the notion that sibling aggression is inherently normative.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29963711
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12939
pmc: PMC7036266
mid: NIHMS973190
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

267-276

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U01 MH082830
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH082830
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U01 MH090301
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2018 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

Références

JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):746-54
pubmed: 26121291
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;53(1):82-96.e3
pubmed: 24342388
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Dec;30(12):1401-21
pubmed: 17118448
Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Apr;38(4):650-63
pubmed: 24325940
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;52(1):26-36
pubmed: 23265631
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:145-55
pubmed: 26254557
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Feb;33(1):97-106
pubmed: 23159327
Dev Psychol. 2000 Jan;36(1):44-53
pubmed: 10645743
Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Oct;38(10):1599-606
pubmed: 24889729
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;51(1):3-22
pubmed: 19874427
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;53(11):1099-108
pubmed: 22928674
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;175(2):114-130
pubmed: 29145753
Aggress Behav. 2015 Jan;41(1):14-24
pubmed: 25187483
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;54(8):626-34
pubmed: 26210331
Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):1024-31
pubmed: 9383624
Pediatrics. 2013 Jul;132(1):79-84
pubmed: 23776124
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;47(6):632-641
pubmed: 18434925
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:27-48
pubmed: 18976138
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Aug;28(4):529-37
pubmed: 24866727
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Feb;36(1):97-106
pubmed: 23000632
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Apr;37(4):213-23
pubmed: 23428164
Am J Health Behav. 2004;28 Suppl 1:S13-23
pubmed: 15055568
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;51(11):1208-16
pubmed: 20584100

Auteurs

Melanie A Dirks (MA)

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Holly E Recchia (HE)

Department of Education, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Ryne Estabrook (R)

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Nina Howe (N)

Department of Education, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Amelie Petitclerc (A)

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

James L Burns (JL)

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Margaret J Briggs-Gowan (MJ)

University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

Lauren S Wakschlag (LS)

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH