Impact of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug Treatment on Radiographic Progression in Early Ankylosing Spondylitis: Its Relationship to Inflammation Control During Treatment.
Adult
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
/ therapeutic use
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
C-Reactive Protein
/ immunology
Disease Progression
Early Medical Intervention
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Radiography
Spine
/ diagnostic imaging
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
/ diagnostic imaging
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Young Adult
Journal
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
ISSN: 2326-5205
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
10
02
2018
accepted:
05
07
2018
pubmed:
10
7
2018
medline:
2
11
2019
entrez:
10
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the impact of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment and inflammation control on radiographic progression in early ankylosing spondylitis (AS) over 4 years. We included a total of 215 patients with early AS (symptom duration <10 years) treated with TNFi (the TNFi group; n = 135) or with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (the control group; n = 80). Two blinded readers assessed radiographic progression using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). Inflammation control was inferred from C-reactive protein (CRP) levels time-averaged between 2 radiologic assessments. Linear mixed modeling was used to estimate mSASSS changes over radiographic intervals as well as the impact of clinical factors on outcomes. The TNFi group had longer disease duration, a higher baseline CRP level, and a higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index than did controls. The time-averaged CRP level over radiographic intervals was lower with TNFi treatment than with NSAID treatment (mean ± SD 0.27 ± 0.30 mg/dl versus 0.61 ± 0.68 mg/dl; P < 0.001). Overall, mean ± SD mSASSS change over the 2-year interval was 1.30 ± 2.97 units. In the multivariable model adjusted for age, smoking status, baseline CRP level, and the presence of syndesmophytes at baseline, the TNFi group showed less mSASSS change over the 2-year interval (β = -0.90 [95% confidence interval {95% CI} -1.51, -0.29]). However, when a time-averaged CRP level was additionally included, it significantly influenced the mSASSS change (β = 1.02 [95% CI 0.32, 1.71]), decreasing the estimated group difference (β = -0.52 [95% CI -1.17, 0.14]). NSAID indices of both groups were not associated with either time-averaged CRP levels or mSASSS changes. Effective suppression of inflammation by TNFi treatment decreases radiographic progression in early AS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29984487
doi: 10.1002/art.40661
pmc: PMC6587468
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
0
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
0
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
82-90Subventions
Organisme : Korea Health Technology R & D Project
Pays : International
Organisme : Ministry of Health Welfare, Republic of Korea
ID : HI14C1277
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Feb;70(2):249-51
pubmed: 20829199
Joint Bone Spine. 2017 Jan;84(1):79-82
pubmed: 27238187
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jan;68(1):18-24
pubmed: 18625618
Health Policy. 2016 Jun;120(6):621-9
pubmed: 26831040
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;65(10):2645-54
pubmed: 23818109
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar;60(3):717-27
pubmed: 19248087
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jan;72(1):23-8
pubmed: 22562977
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jul;69(7):1011-1019
pubmed: 27696754
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;77(1):63-69
pubmed: 28939631
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;65(10):2537-40
pubmed: 23818040
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;68(3):672-8
pubmed: 26473982
J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91
pubmed: 7699630
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Mar;65(3):316-20
pubmed: 16096329
Multivariate Behav Res. 1995 Jan 1;30(1):41
pubmed: 20157641
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Aug;68(8):1899-903
pubmed: 27015283
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Feb;64(2):179-82
pubmed: 15286006
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct;58(10):3063-70
pubmed: 18821688
Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361-8
pubmed: 6231933
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Dec;75(12):2114-2118
pubmed: 27125522
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May;54(5):1646-52
pubmed: 16646033
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;77(4):533-540
pubmed: 29183878
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;77(1):3-17
pubmed: 28684559
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1455-61
pubmed: 24812292
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Aug;75(8):1438-43
pubmed: 26242443
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May;58(5):1324-31
pubmed: 18438853
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Apr;73(4):710-5
pubmed: 23505240
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Dec;71(12):2002-5
pubmed: 22915615
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R127
pubmed: 19703304
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):127-9
pubmed: 15051621