Acute perceptions of preferred cigarettes when blinded to brand.
advertising and promotion
packaging and labelling
social marketing
tobacco industry
Journal
Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
23
03
2018
revised:
22
05
2018
accepted:
14
06
2018
pubmed:
12
7
2018
medline:
11
1
2020
entrez:
12
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Marketing claims often have promoted specific perceptions that users should expect from acutely smoking that cigarette brand. Yet, little controlled study has determined the degree to which actual perceptions are based on the cigarette's tobacco constituents in the absence of knowledge about the brand's identity. 194 adult dependent smokers rated their perceptions on 'liking', 'satisfying', 'strong' and perceived amount of 'nicotine' after smoking ad lib one of their preferred brands of cigarettes. All did so either when blinded (n=118) or unblinded (n=76) to the brand they were given, with the blinding conditions from separate studies. These between-groups secondary analyses determined differences in perceptions based on blinding to brand, controlling for age and cigarettes/day. All perceptions were lower for those smoking own brand under blinded versus unblinded conditions, as hypothesised. Consistent with lowered perceptions for smoking one's own brand obtained from the 118 blinded to brand, their 'somewhat' ratings for a 'how similar to own brand' item indicated uncertainty, just mid-way between 'not at all' and 'very much' on the 0-100 visual analogue scale. (The 76 unblinded were already informed it was their own brand.) CONCLUSIONS: Acute perceptions of one's own cigarette are substantially lower when smokers are simply unaware of brand, relative to those aware it is their preferred brand. Results support the notion that perceptions of smoking own brand are enhanced by marketing efforts to associate brands with expectations of pleasurable subjective effects, beyond the impact due solely to the cigarette's manufactured product constituents.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Marketing claims often have promoted specific perceptions that users should expect from acutely smoking that cigarette brand. Yet, little controlled study has determined the degree to which actual perceptions are based on the cigarette's tobacco constituents in the absence of knowledge about the brand's identity.
METHODS
194 adult dependent smokers rated their perceptions on 'liking', 'satisfying', 'strong' and perceived amount of 'nicotine' after smoking ad lib one of their preferred brands of cigarettes. All did so either when blinded (n=118) or unblinded (n=76) to the brand they were given, with the blinding conditions from separate studies. These between-groups secondary analyses determined differences in perceptions based on blinding to brand, controlling for age and cigarettes/day.
RESULTS
All perceptions were lower for those smoking own brand under blinded versus unblinded conditions, as hypothesised. Consistent with lowered perceptions for smoking one's own brand obtained from the 118 blinded to brand, their 'somewhat' ratings for a 'how similar to own brand' item indicated uncertainty, just mid-way between 'not at all' and 'very much' on the 0-100 visual analogue scale. (The 76 unblinded were already informed it was their own brand.) CONCLUSIONS: Acute perceptions of one's own cigarette are substantially lower when smokers are simply unaware of brand, relative to those aware it is their preferred brand. Results support the notion that perceptions of smoking own brand are enhanced by marketing efforts to associate brands with expectations of pleasurable subjective effects, beyond the impact due solely to the cigarette's manufactured product constituents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29991640
pii: tobaccocontrol-2018-054388
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054388
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
311-316Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA035774
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UH3 TR000958
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA019478
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.