Inverse stage migration patterns in North American patients undergoing local prostate cancer treatment: a contemporary population-based update in light of the 2012 USPSTF recommendations.
Adenocarcinoma
/ blood
Aged
Early Detection of Cancer
Humans
Male
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
North America
/ epidemiology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Radiotherapy
SEER Program
United States
/ epidemiology
Watchful Waiting
Active surveillance
Radical prostatectomy
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and end results (SEER)
University of California San Francisco (UCSF) cancer of the prostate risk assessment-surgical score (CAPRA-S)
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
01
03
2018
accepted:
28
06
2018
pubmed:
12
7
2018
medline:
8
8
2019
entrez:
12
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent studies demonstrated ongoing inverse stage migration in prostate cancer (PCa) patients towards more advanced and unfavorable tumors. The USPSTF grade D recommendation may impact this trend in North American patients. We assessed contemporary stage migration and treatment trends in a large North American cohort diagnosed with PCa 2009-2014. Time-trend analyses were performed in patients within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, with complete data of clinical tumor stage, biopsy Gleason score, and validated PSA values, resulting in 211,645 assessable patients. Patients were stratified according to their different treatment methods [radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), and no local treatment (NLT)] and according to clinical and pathological risk stratification (D'Amico and CAPRA-S score). Over time, proportions of D'Amico low-risk (LR) decreased, with an increase in intermediate-to-high-risk (IR/HR) patients. These trends were more distinct in men ≥ 70 years. NLT proportions increased, most notably in D'Amico LR and/or older patients. Conversely, RP proportions remained stable in younger HR and increased in older HR patients. Similar patterns were demonstrated in the RP-treated subgroup: D'Amico HR, pT3, and/or lymph-node invasion or CAPRA-S HR proportions increased from 23.5 to 30.8, 24.3 to 32.9, and 10.7 to 16.3% (each p ≤ 0.015). Inverse stage migration with increase of unfavorable PCa continues in most contemporary North American patients. However, a paradigm shift to treat LR patients with less invasive methods (NLT) was demonstrated. Contrary, HR patients increasingly undergo LT. Future studies with long-term follow-up might answer if inverse stage migration vs. treatment trends translate into different PCa metastases/mortality rates vs. proposed NLT benefits, particularly related to USPSTF-recommended reduced PSA screening.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29992380
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2396-2
pii: 10.1007/s00345-018-2396-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
469-479Références
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77
pubmed: 12090408
Epidemiology. 2002 Jul;13(4):437-44
pubmed: 12094099
BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(12):1513-8
pubmed: 18422773
BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(8):1256-61
pubmed: 21244612
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34
pubmed: 22801674
Prostate Cancer. 2012;2012:691380
pubmed: 23251806
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):326-33
pubmed: 24998118
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):95-102
pubmed: 25106900
J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1519-24
pubmed: 25481037
J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):1970-5
pubmed: 25498570
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):343-9
pubmed: 25681290
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):175-8
pubmed: 25736732
BJU Int. 2016 May;117(5):740-7
pubmed: 25787671
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1587-93
pubmed: 26087383
JAMA. 2015 Nov 17;314(19):2077-9
pubmed: 26575066
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Dec 1;2(12):1657-1660
pubmed: 27541955
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jan;14(1):26-37
pubmed: 27995937
J Urol. 2017 Jul;198(1):86-91
pubmed: 28130104
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):591-599
pubmed: 28347770
Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):118-124
pubmed: 28385454
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1623-1624
pubmed: 28494051
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1230-1240
pubmed: 28552708
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jan;4(1):68-74
pubmed: 28753764
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):7-13
pubmed: 29063268
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):15-20
pubmed: 29116393
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):383-391
pubmed: 29330583
World J Urol. 2018 May;36(5):761-768
pubmed: 29380130
IARC Sci Publ. 1994;(128):1-302
pubmed: 7698823