Barriers and Facilitators of Vigorous Cardiorespiratory Training in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Surveys Among Patients, Physiotherapists, and Rheumatologists.
Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise Therapy
/ adverse effects
Female
Health Care Surveys
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Status
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Patient Compliance
Patient Participation
Patients
/ psychology
Physical Therapists
/ psychology
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Referral and Consultation
Rheumatologists
/ psychology
Spondylarthritis
/ diagnosis
Stakeholder Participation
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Arthritis care & research
ISSN: 2151-4658
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
30
11
2017
accepted:
10
07
2018
pubmed:
14
7
2018
medline:
25
2
2020
entrez:
14
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vigorous cardiorespiratory training (CRT) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) is effective, safe. and feasible; however, it has not yet been adopted in axial SpA exercise programs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators for vigorous CRT among patients, physiotherapists, and rheumatologists. Stakeholder-specific surveys were used to examine perceptions of barriers and facilitators to vigorous CRT, with categories organized according to the recommendations proposed by Grol and Wensing. Respondents chose the 3 most important barrier and facilitator categories and rated individual items on a 4-point scale. Frequencies and proportions were calculated, and ratings between active and inactive patients were compared. Among all patients (n = 575 [response rate 34%]), the top 3 barrier categories were "low motivation" (n = 317 [59%]), "unsuccessful timing in daily routine" (n = 292 [55%]), and "hindering disease symptoms" (n = 272 [51%]). The top 3 facilitator categories were "high motivation" (n = 248 [47%]), "good organizational conditions" (n = 217 [41%]), and "facilitating disease symptoms" (n = 209 [40%]). More inactive patients than active patients chose "low motivation" as a barrier (P = 0.01). Among physiotherapists (n = 40 [response rate 48%]), the top 3 barrier categories were "heterogeneous groups" (n = 26 [70%]), "difficult organizational conditions" (n = 19 [51%]), and "low perceived motivation" (n = 19 [51%]). Among physiotherapists, the top 3 facilitator categories were "knowledge" (n = 20 [54%]), "homogeneous group composition," and "high perceived motivation" (both n = 17 [46%]). For rheumatologists (n = 73 [response rate 17%], with 54 [74%] answering barrier items and 68 [93%] answering facilitator items), the strongest barriers included "not enough information" (n = 25 [47%]) and "anticipated or perceived disinterest of patient" (n = 27 [50%]). The strongest facilitators reported by rheumatologists included "exercise important topic even in limited consultation time" (n = 65 [96%]) and "clear evidence for effectiveness of flexibility exercises" (n = 62 [91%]). The identified facilitators and barriers will guide the development of stakeholder-specific implementation strategies.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
839-851Informations de copyright
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.